2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00276-021-02703-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The clinical anatomy of variations of the pectoralis minor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical consequences of variants are usually minor; however, there is some evidence that PM muscle insertion has the potential to cause neurovascular compression. [36] Surgical treatment should be planned after adequate examination with appropriate imaging modalities in patients unresponsive to conservative treatment.…”
Section: Treatment Conservative Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical consequences of variants are usually minor; however, there is some evidence that PM muscle insertion has the potential to cause neurovascular compression. [36] Surgical treatment should be planned after adequate examination with appropriate imaging modalities in patients unresponsive to conservative treatment.…”
Section: Treatment Conservative Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlations between the coracohumeral ligament and the pectoralis minor end have been highlighted by several researchers. Such variations that are, in clinical practice, normally discovered in the course of rotator cuff syndrome surgery, should be considered during the diagnosis of mechanical impingement [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many reported anatomical variations. [ 9 , 10 ] Deviations from the general pattern of origin and insertion of the PM are relatively common; as many as 23% of people demonstrate some variation. [ 9 ] In addition, PM muscle thickness may vary depending on the underlying pathology; for example, in spasticity, the thickness of the muscle may decrease below 0.5 cm (Figure 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%