The client side of everyday corruption in Central and Eastern Europe: The case of Chinese migrant entrepreneurs in Romania

Abstract

This article provides an in-depth understanding of the corruption experiences of migrant entrepreneurs in transition economies. Drawing from ethnographic research, including 50 qualitative interviews with Chinese migrant entrepreneurs active in wholesale markets, nongovernmental organizations, and supervisory agencies in Romania, this article demonstrates that normalization of corruption by migrant entrepreneurs should be understood in the historical context of the wholesale market as a product of post-1989 transition in Central and Eastern Europe. At a social-interactional level, normalization of corruption is revealed through how migrants use decriminalizing language to refer to corruption and perceive corruption as a survival strategy by public officials. Moreover, the legal and outsider status of migrants and their knowledge of the language, rules and laws further determine migrants' position as clients of 'on the spot' corruption.

Culture and corruption: An experimental comparison of cultural patterns on the corruption propensity in Poland and Russia

“…The temporal dimension refers to the duration of an institution, the social dimension to its binding nature and the material dimension to its authoritativeness. While we can narrow down the temporal dimension of corruption-promoting institutions by dating their emergence in Poland and Russia to form our hypotheses, the degree of the current social and material dimension remains an empirically open question (Hiah, 2020). To narrow our research question for an empirical approach, we follow further analytical distinctions:…”

Entrepreneurial Skills to Be Successful In the Global and Digital World: Proposal for a Frame of Reference for Entrepreneurial Education

“…Regarding social issues, it should be noted that if development does not happen through talent, merit, the balance between State action and private initiative, problems such as poverty and social exclusion, insecurity, and criminality will persist corruption and fraud [58][59][60]. For example, when it is installed in institutions, to the point of becoming cultural and endemic, it encourages individual acts of corruption, namely the monopoly of decision-making power, little transparency, and lack of responsibility.…”

Public attitude as a determinant of petty corruption in Egypt: a survey study

“…Acceptance or refusal of a deviant conduct is based upon people's belief of the fairness of the laws regulating it and their classification of it as justified (Edwards, 2010, p. 457). For example, Chinese migrants did not see bribing Romanian police officers as morally wrong because their salaries were low and the services which they provided were essential (Hiah, 2019). A study of 6,000 interviews with the public and over 1300 interviews with street level officials also finds that although both citizens and the officials explicitly condemn bribes, they confess to giving and taking them, and would do it again if they must.…”