2012
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cleavage stage embryo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1). In particular, the complete exclusion of large fragments and blastomeres has been observed in both compact morulas and blastocysts from several mammalian species, including humans, rhesus macaques, cattle, and mice homozygous for the yellow allele (A y ) of the agouti locus (Calarco and Pedersen 1976; Lindner and Wright 1983; Alikani et al 1999, 2002; Hardy 1999; Van Soom et al 2003; Prados et al 2012; Chavez et al 2014). Although the frequency of blastomere exclusion is unknown since it is not a well-documented process, pre-implantation embryos are generally thought to tolerate the loss of one or more blastomeres based on blastomere biopsy for PGS.…”
Section: Aneuploidy Tolerance and Rescuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). In particular, the complete exclusion of large fragments and blastomeres has been observed in both compact morulas and blastocysts from several mammalian species, including humans, rhesus macaques, cattle, and mice homozygous for the yellow allele (A y ) of the agouti locus (Calarco and Pedersen 1976; Lindner and Wright 1983; Alikani et al 1999, 2002; Hardy 1999; Van Soom et al 2003; Prados et al 2012; Chavez et al 2014). Although the frequency of blastomere exclusion is unknown since it is not a well-documented process, pre-implantation embryos are generally thought to tolerate the loss of one or more blastomeres based on blastomere biopsy for PGS.…”
Section: Aneuploidy Tolerance and Rescuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, embryo assessment is limited to static microscopic evaluations [17][18][19]. Alternative selection methods include genetic screening [20][21][22], morphokinetics [23], metabolomics [24,25], proteomics, oxygen consumption measurement and birefringence imaging [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we analyzed the correlation between sperm chromatin status in patients' ejaculates, i.e., maturity and integrity, and the two parameters of zygote development, i.e., embryo development defined as the percentage of oocyte that can develop into a zygote within 72 hours compared to the total sperm-injected oocyte and the cleavage rate defined as the percentage of zygotes divided into more than 8 blastomeres within 72 hours [Prados et al 2012]. The analysis of the overall samples showed that there was no significant correlation between sperm chromatin maturity and either embryo formation (p=0.415) or cleavage rate (p=0.282).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%