1984
DOI: 10.1144/gsl.qjeg.1984.017.04.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The classification of mudrocks for engineering purposes

Abstract: Summary A classification of mudrocks for engineering purposes was considered necessary in order to improve the common qualitative use of a variety of geological terms. There has been a lack of agreement between authors on the precise definition of these terms. Mudrock is defined as a fine- to very finegrained, siliciclastic sediment or sedimentary rock. Quantitative boundaries for this group of rocks are proposed using meaningful soil and rock index parameters, at changes in mechanical o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theoretical bearing capacity factor of 4.5 corresponds to the UCS of approximately 0.82 MPa in Figure 2-17. This UCS value is slightly above the lower limit (0.6 MPa) of UCS for non-durable rock or clay shale (Grainger, 1984;Morgenstern and Eigenbrod, 1974). This observation is intriguing because the key characteristic of rock (not soil) is the existence of fractures or fissures and their influences on the overall behavior of rock mass.…”
Section: Datasets Ofmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The theoretical bearing capacity factor of 4.5 corresponds to the UCS of approximately 0.82 MPa in Figure 2-17. This UCS value is slightly above the lower limit (0.6 MPa) of UCS for non-durable rock or clay shale (Grainger, 1984;Morgenstern and Eigenbrod, 1974). This observation is intriguing because the key characteristic of rock (not soil) is the existence of fractures or fissures and their influences on the overall behavior of rock mass.…”
Section: Datasets Ofmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…List of Tables ....................................................................................................... xiii List of Figures ..................................................................................................... xvi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ........................................................................1 Table 2-1 Typical attributes of classification system for in situ rock (Deen, 1981) ........... Table 2-2 Field estimates of unconfined compressive strength (modified from Hoek and Brown, 1997) ........................................................................................................ Table 2-3 Geological classification of mudrocks (Blatt, 1982) ........................................ Table 2-4 Suggested geological classification of argillaceous materials (Gamble, 1971) Table 3-17 Cation Exchange Capacity of typical clay minerals (Gray et al, 1980) ........ ....................................................................................................... xiv Table 4-2 Back calculated UCS, and constant m ............................................................ Table 5-1 Gamble's Slake Durability Classification (Gamble, 1971) ............................ Table 5-2 Engineering classification of intact rock on the basis of UCS (Deere, 1968) Table 5-3 Engineering classification of intact rock on the basis of modulus ratio (After Deere, 1968) ....................................................................................................... (Hawkins, 1998) ........ (Mead, 1938;Underwood, 1967). ............. (Grainger, 1984) ... (Schmitt et al, 1994) . (Botts, 1998) .....................................................................…”
Section: Table Of Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is common for CO2 storage studies to focus only on the target formation and to exclude ambient mudrocks, defined as a fine‐ to very fine‐grained siliciclastic sediments or sedimentary rocks [ Grainger , ] bounding the reservoir because low‐permeability mudrocks prevent vertical CO2 migration due to high capillary entry pressure. However, most regional aquifers are not closed and also the overlying and underlying mudrocks are not perfectly impermeable [ Neuzil , ; Dewhurst et al ., ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%