1959
DOI: 10.2307/1970186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Classification of Immersions of Spheres in Euclidean Spaces

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
114
0
1

Year Published

1974
1974
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
114
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The analogous conclusion holds if dim X = 2 and X admits a Morse exhaustion function ρ : X → R without critical points of index >1. Theorem 1.4 is a holomorphic analogue of the Smale-Hirsch h-principle for smooth immersions [36,39,54] and of the Gromov-Phillips h-principle for smooth submersions [34,51]. The conclusion holds with a fixed Stein structure on X provided that Y satisfies a certain flexibility condition introduced (for submersions) in [18].…”
Section: Theorem 11 Let X Be a Stein Manifold With The Complex Strucmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The analogous conclusion holds if dim X = 2 and X admits a Morse exhaustion function ρ : X → R without critical points of index >1. Theorem 1.4 is a holomorphic analogue of the Smale-Hirsch h-principle for smooth immersions [36,39,54] and of the Gromov-Phillips h-principle for smooth submersions [34,51]. The conclusion holds with a fixed Stein structure on X provided that Y satisfies a certain flexibility condition introduced (for submersions) in [18].…”
Section: Theorem 11 Let X Be a Stein Manifold With The Complex Strucmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…where ψ is an orientation-preserving diffeomorphism (see [20,Theorem 5.2] In our previous paper [24], we related the Hopf invariant for F to the normal Euler class of F; however, there was a sign error. This subsection is devoted to correcting the sign error and reviewing a formula for the Haefliger invariant with the corrected sign (see also [2,3,8] …”
Section: Definition 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ekholm and Szűcs [6, Theorem 1.1 and Remark 3.1] give a formula for the Smale invariant [20] ω : Imm[S 3 , R 5 ] → Z, which provides a group isomorphism between the group Imm[S 3 , R 5 ] of regular homotopy classes of immersions of S 3 in R 5 and the integers Z. …”
Section: Ekholm and Szűcs' Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smale in [1] has surprised geometers when showing that any two immersions of S 2 in R 3 are regularly homotopic. This work has been extended to a general theory of immersions of manifolds by Smale and Hirsch in [2,3]. Implications of the Smale-Hirsch theory to immersions of surfaces appear in [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%