2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnt.2009.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The class number one problem for some totally complex quartic number fields

Abstract: We prove that there are 95 non-isomorphic totally complex quartic fields whose rings of algebraic integers are generated by an algebraic unit and whose class numbers are equal to 1. Moreover, we prove Louboutin's Conjecture according to which a totally complex quartic unit ε u generally generates the unit group of the quartic order Z[ε u ].

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in the above listed exceptional cases, u is not a fundamental unit of R. For a quartic analogue of Nagell's theorem the reader is referred to [6]. The main result of the present article (see Theorem 2) answers the above question in the (only remaining) case where f has three distinct real roots i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, in the above listed exceptional cases, u is not a fundamental unit of R. For a quartic analogue of Nagell's theorem the reader is referred to [6]. The main result of the present article (see Theorem 2) answers the above question in the (only remaining) case where f has three distinct real roots i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Few special-case results of Thomas (from [7]), in which he has determined a complete system of fundamental units of R are then applied to some of our exceptional cases. Our result in the positive discriminant case is: u is a fundamental unit of R except when either max{a, b}, min{a, b} = n 2 , 2n for some integer n 3, or (max{a, b}, min{a, b}) is one of the 7 sporadic pairs: (6,5), (3, −4), (5, −5), (11, −7), (19, −9), (20, −9), (29, −11). Furthermore, u is not a fundamental unit of R in the exceptional cases where (max{a, b}, min{a, b}) is either (6,5) or of the form (n 2 , 2n).…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is natural to wonder whether is a fundamental unit of this order. It turns out that the answer is in general yes, and that a fundamental unit of this order can be explicitly given in the rare cases when the answer is no (see [Lou06,Lou08,Lou10,Nag,PL]). Now let be a totally real algebraic cubic unit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, in Theorem 2, we give a simpler proof of their key result [PL,Theorem 2]. But first, we show in Theorem 1 that their method can also be used to give a simpler proof of [Lou06,Theorem 2], the key result for solving the case of a not totally real cubic algebraic unit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%