The Claim that Neumann’s Induction Law Is Consistent with Ampère’s Law Rejected

Jonson, Jan Olof

doi:10.7763/ijmo.2014.v4.394

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, concerning Neumann"s work on electric induction, it has been satisfactorily shown elsewhere that he has performed several fallacious calculations [46]. Among those is the effort to prove that the mathematical treatment of electromagnetic induction is consistent with Ampère"s Law.…”

Section: Neumann's Induction Lawmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Extended Use of Coulomb’s Law in Relation to Established Laws within Electromagnetism

Jonson¹

2016

JBAP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-The competence of the basically electrostatic Coulomb's Law has historically been assumed to be restricted to pure electrostatics. As soon as electric charges were studied in motion, new sets of laws were introduced to explain the electromagnetic forces that are impelled by the motion. Among these new laws are Neumann's law of induction, Grassmann's force law, Lorentz' force law, and Ampère's force law. Furthermore, the difficulties in explaining the nature of light have given rise to the so-called wave-particle paradox. 1997 was the first year of the public circulation of research results that succeeded in showing that the basic force behind cases involving electricity or, more precisely, electromagnetism, can be derived from electrostatics. The aim of this article is to unify the results of existing theoretical research that discusses problems inherent within the prevailing standpoint on electromagnetism. In this paper, the conflict between the Lorentz Force Law and Ampère's Law is explored. Simultaneously, an alternative based strictly on electrostatics is closely examined. The very limited interest in this field of research, however, makes the amount of existing papers rather limited. The present study's new intervention is as follows: The so-called Ampè re forces between collinear currents, as in Ampère's bridge and in exploding wires, have been explained to be due to electrostatics, provided that the propagation delay dependant on the motion of charges is correctly taken into account. The Lorentz Force Law fails in this case. Additionally, electromagnetic induction can be explained by applying electrostatics, whereas the induction law fails. Light on the orbit electrons in the atoms involved in excitation and de-excitation of states can be explained using Coulomb's law (this has been widely disputed within science). The appearance of light at an atom hit by electromagnetic radiation can be shown to constitute a case of electromagnetic induction. The present study's conclusion is therefore that Coulomb's law is the only necessary force law within electromagnetism.

show abstract

Section: Neumann's Induction Lawmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[46,57] Ds vC Ds E      (6) E denotes the induced electromotive force (emf) per unit length, Ds is the infinitesimal element of the secondary circuit,  is a constant factor and C is the force that the inducing circuit exerts on the conductor carrying the induced current, dependent on the direction. [58] .…”

Section: )mentioning

confidence: 99%

Extended Use of Coulomb’s Law in Relation to Established Laws within Electromagnetism

Jonson¹

2016

JBAP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In several papers evidence has been presented that is able to refute the widely recognized electromagnetic theory of today [1][2][3][4][5]. One such fundamental law is Lorentz' force law.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In fact, it has been possible to explain this, too, using basically Coulomb's law [15][16][17][18]. One may mention also electromagnetic induction [3][4][5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Electromagnetic Force between Two Parallel Current Conductors Explained Using Coulomb’s Law

Jonson¹

2015

Advanced Electromagnetic Waves

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this book chapter the electromagnetic force between two parallel electric conductors has been derived, applying thereby the effects of propagation delay and the Special Relativity theory, taking thereby also into count the thus far neglected effects introduced by the voltage sources of both circuits. This has been done for a specific case consisting of two rectangular circuits, aligned to each other along one of the long sides, at a distance that is short compared to the long sides. The intention in doing so is to make a meaningful application of the concept of two parallel conductors of infinite length , so that it is possible to make a complete calculation of the force between the two circuits, avoiding thus making a vague claim as for example Maxwell, saying that the other parts of the conductors do not contribute to the force. What is radically new in this interpretation is that it is Coulomb s law that is responsible for the force.

show abstract

The Repulsive Force Within Ampère’s Bridge Explained by Coulomb’s Law and Special Relativity Theory, Taking into Account the Effects of Propagation Delay

Jonson

2015

JBAP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Claim that Neumann’s Induction Law Is Consistent with Ampère’s Law Rejected

Cited by 3 publications

References 10 publications

Extended Use of Coulomb’s Law in Relation to Established Laws within Electromagnetism

Extended Use of Coulomb’s Law in Relation to Established Laws within Electromagnetism

The Electromagnetic Force between Two Parallel Current Conductors Explained Using Coulomb’s Law

The Repulsive Force Within Ampère’s Bridge Explained by Coulomb’s Law and Special Relativity Theory, Taking into Account the Effects of Propagation Delay

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About