2010
DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2010.522422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Citizenship Conundrum in Post-Communist Europe: The Instructive Case of Croatia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same typology was used in examinations of nation-building processes in Europe after 1990 (e.g., Brubaker, 1996b, 2009; Kolstø, 2014; Štiks, 2010). These processes have been particularly intricate because destructive/fragmenting forces that led to the demise of the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia ran parallel to the unifying impetus generated by the signing of the Treaty of Maastricht which created the European Union.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same typology was used in examinations of nation-building processes in Europe after 1990 (e.g., Brubaker, 1996b, 2009; Kolstø, 2014; Štiks, 2010). These processes have been particularly intricate because destructive/fragmenting forces that led to the demise of the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia ran parallel to the unifying impetus generated by the signing of the Treaty of Maastricht which created the European Union.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mostly concerned the Serbian ethnic minority, as it was one of the most affected minorities during The Croatian War of Independence. In this sense, regardless of the minimized existence of the Serbian minority within Croatian society, the State still needed to find an adequate way to set the relations and legal framework to minimize the ethnic intolerance within the frame of majority-minority relations (Štiks 2010Dimitrijević 2012). Even though the accession to the EU certainly had a positive effect on the legal framework of citizenship policies and regulations of migrant issues, it is questionable whether Croatia engaged in profound reforms of its issues and lowered the ethnocentric character of the State, or whether these changes only satisfied the more general and easier-to-handle issues, without carrying out a real change on the ground (Štiks 2015).…”
Section: Croatiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Built primarily on case studies, scholars developed a rich empirical literature on the ways in which kin-states crafted their policies and used diplomatic advocacy, cross-border political, economic, and cultural networks and institutions, and various forms of citizenship to protect, promote, and engage with ethnic kin communities (King and Melvin 1998;Waterbury 2010;Wolff and Cordell 2007). This work also helped highlight types of kin-state policies that seemed distinct from those typically utilized by migrant sending states, such as the emergence of "benefit laws" that provided special rights as a form of semi-citizenship to external co-ethnics (Fowler 2001;Shevel 2010;Udrea 2014), or other forms of external citizenship (Bauböck, Perchinig, Sievers 2007;Štiks 2010).…”
Section: Conceptualizing Kin-state Politics: Between Irredentism and mentioning
confidence: 99%