2021
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/czqm5
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Citadel Itself: Defending Semantic Internalism

Abstract: Semantic internalism is the view that linguistic meaning amounts to forms of conceptual instructions, and that the process of forming linguistic representations does not involve reference to extra-mental entities. Contemporary philosophy of language remains predominantly externalist in focus, having developed systems of extensional reference which depart from classical rationalist assumptions. I will defend semantic internalism using a broad range of case studies, accruing what I see at the most convincing arg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Looking at different types of relative clauses (subject relative and object relative) that involve different syntactic movement paths, their entropy reduction pattern directly matches independent psycholinguistic measures of reading difficulty. Conceptually speaking, entropy reduction measures and Kolmogorov complexity measures speak to the costs of endogenous syntactic computations, being more directly informative about internal states than more externalist measures like surprisal(Murphy 2021).A challenge for future research is to appropriately frame the interfacing of syntax with other systems in terms that accord with the minimisation of surprise and variational free energy. Since the FEP has attendant process theories (e.g., active inference), one of the latent payoffs of our suggestions here is the development of generative models of active inference that fully ground specific factors in syntactic theory and, through simulation work, may align with recent advances in the electrophysiology, neural dynamics and neural harmonics of syntax(Keitel et al 2017, Tavano et al 2021.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at different types of relative clauses (subject relative and object relative) that involve different syntactic movement paths, their entropy reduction pattern directly matches independent psycholinguistic measures of reading difficulty. Conceptually speaking, entropy reduction measures and Kolmogorov complexity measures speak to the costs of endogenous syntactic computations, being more directly informative about internal states than more externalist measures like surprisal(Murphy 2021).A challenge for future research is to appropriately frame the interfacing of syntax with other systems in terms that accord with the minimisation of surprise and variational free energy. Since the FEP has attendant process theories (e.g., active inference), one of the latent payoffs of our suggestions here is the development of generative models of active inference that fully ground specific factors in syntactic theory and, through simulation work, may align with recent advances in the electrophysiology, neural dynamics and neural harmonics of syntax(Keitel et al 2017, Tavano et al 2021.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%