2015
DOI: 10.4007/annals.2015.182.2.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The circle method and bounds for L-functions - IV: Subconvexity for twists of GL(3) L-functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
115
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
115
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For p = 1 this exponent matches the recent result of [1] which improved on the then best known subconvexity bound in the t-aspect, due to Munshi [14], with δ = 1 16 . It also improves, in the allowed range for (t, p), the best known subconvexity bound in the hybrid (t, p)-aspect, due to Lin [11], with δ = 1 36 .…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…For p = 1 this exponent matches the recent result of [1] which improved on the then best known subconvexity bound in the t-aspect, due to Munshi [14], with δ = 1 16 . It also improves, in the allowed range for (t, p), the best known subconvexity bound in the hybrid (t, p)-aspect, due to Lin [11], with δ = 1 36 .…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…We also mention the work of Munshi [16], where he proved the subconvex bound for L(1/2 + it, φ) as in (1) with θ = 11/8 without the self-dual assumption on φ. The current record in this general case is θ = 27/20 due to Aggarwal [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of the above result is similar to Theorem 1.1, see Li [17,Appendix] for example. One can also think about the hybrid subconvexity bounds for GL(3) L-functions in other cases, such as Munshi [21,22,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%