2005
DOI: 10.3354/ame038157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ciliate-copepod link in marine ecosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

17
270
1
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 424 publications
(295 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(75 reference statements)
17
270
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, we observed a quite high composition of Oithona (15.6%) at the first-year bloom and high composition of Acartia (18.2%) at the $$$second-year bloom (data no shown). Although microzooplankton might contribute less than phytoplankton to mesozooplankton diets in terms of ingestion rates in rich food conditions (Calbet and Saiz, 2005;Liu et al, 2005b), our result suggested that carnivorous feeding was always a reason for the reduction of the clearance rate of phytoplankton by mesozooplankton assemblage even during phytoplankton bloom in addition to functional response. Preference on microzooplankton by copepods during phytoplankton bloom and associated trophic cascades were also reported in other coastal and estuarine waters (e.g., Fessenden and Cowles, 1994;Liu et al, 2005a).…”
Section: The Effect Of Mesozooplankton Carnivorymentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, we observed a quite high composition of Oithona (15.6%) at the first-year bloom and high composition of Acartia (18.2%) at the $$$second-year bloom (data no shown). Although microzooplankton might contribute less than phytoplankton to mesozooplankton diets in terms of ingestion rates in rich food conditions (Calbet and Saiz, 2005;Liu et al, 2005b), our result suggested that carnivorous feeding was always a reason for the reduction of the clearance rate of phytoplankton by mesozooplankton assemblage even during phytoplankton bloom in addition to functional response. Preference on microzooplankton by copepods during phytoplankton bloom and associated trophic cascades were also reported in other coastal and estuarine waters (e.g., Fessenden and Cowles, 1994;Liu et al, 2005a).…”
Section: The Effect Of Mesozooplankton Carnivorymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…It has been reported by many field studies that when omnivorous species dominate in assemblage, mesozooplankton or copepods (a major group of mesozooplankton) often prefer feeding on microzooplankton to phytoplankton due to larger sizes and higher nutritional quality of microzooplankton (e.g., Stoecker and Capuzzo, 1990;Gifford, 1991;Fessenden and Cowles, 1994;Atkinson et al, 1996;Nejstgaard et al, 2001;Zeldis et al, 2002;Calbet and Saiz, 2005;Liu et al, 2005b;Gifford et al, 2007). Predation on microzooplankton is also an important feeding strategy of omnivorous species that are able to switch their feeding behaviors to conquer food limitation or to survive during nuisance phytoplankton blooms in coastal waters (Kiørboe et al, 1996;Nejstgaard et al, 1997;Gifford et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ciliates are a trophic link between nano-and picoplankton, and larger metazoan organisms (Pierce & Turner 1992, Calbet & Saiz 2005, and are important grazers on harmful algal bloom species (Rosetta & McManus 2003, Kamiyama & Matsuyama 2005. Microbial assemblages shift and change with biotic and abiotic processes (Fuhrman et al 2006), and hence identifying the abundance and diversity of key organisms is essential to understanding ecosystem functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A partir de estos organismos, el zooplancton e incluso vertebrados superiores, obtienen la energía necesaria para sobrevivir, estructurando la trama trófica marina tradicional (Cifuentes et al, 2000;Friedland et al, 2012). En este escenario, los consumidores primarios que hacen parte del zooplancton se convierten en el enlace directo entre los productores primarios y los consumidores de la parte alta de la trama trófica, por lo que se convierten en un eslabón crucial para la transferencia de carbono en el ambiente pelágico (Huskin et En los mares tropicales, los consumidores primarios de la trama trófica pelágica lo conforman esencialmente los copépodos (Cifuentes et al, 2000;Calbet & Saiz, 2005;McKinnnon & Duggan, 2014). Estos organismos consumen diariamente la mitad de su propio peso, es decir cerca de 120000 diatomeas al día (Gifford & Dagg, 1991;Mauchline, 1998;Boling et al, 2012) y se constituyen en el engranaje de la "bomba biológica" en la columna de agua.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified