“…However, it should be noted that, in failing to account for the probability that the remains represent different population groups from different periods, when comparing the Verteba remains to the earlier prehistoric (Mesolithic and Neolithic) populations interred in the Dnieper-Donets Mariupol-type cemeteries along the Dnieper and its tributaries (Lillie 1996;Potekhina 1998;1999;Telegin et al 2002;2003), these authors erroneously conclude that significantly shorter bone lengths, in addition to higher rates of enamel hypoplasias (which are non-specific indicators of stress; Goodman et al 1984;Goodman, Rose 1991) suggest that the Trypillian farming lifestyle was more stressful in terms of physiological perturbations when contrasted with the hunter-fisher-foragers of the Dnieper Rapids region. Given the fact that the earlier Mesolithic and Neolithic DnieperDonets populations were tall, with massive skeletons and very wide faces (with two variants in evidencedolichocrany and mesocrany (Potekhina 1998)), and that Inna Potekhina (1998.67-68;1999;also Telegin et al 2002;2003) has shown that the DnieperDonets populations differed markedly from the Trypillia, Sredny Stog and Kemi-Oba populations, with Trypillia populations being of smaller stature and more gracile, it is apparent that using long-bone lengths as a measure of population stress between groups that are distinct in both anthropological and chronological terms is a fundamentally flawed approach.…”