1988
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1988.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The chromosome complement of Sorex granarius–the ancestral karyotype of the common shrew (Sorex araneus)?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is generally assumed that the ancestral karyotype of the common shrew consisted of acrocentric chromosomes and that all metacentrics were formed by Robertsonian fusion mutations (Searle 1984). This hypothesis is supported by comparisons with other species of Sorex (Meylan and Hausser 1973, Wójcik and Searle 1988, Volobouev and Catzeflis 1989). An alternative hypothesis is that the observed metacentrics were formed either by Robertsonian fusions of acrocentrics, or by whole-arm reciprocal translocations between different metacentrics (Halkka at al.…”
Section: Relationships Between Polish and Other European Racessupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is generally assumed that the ancestral karyotype of the common shrew consisted of acrocentric chromosomes and that all metacentrics were formed by Robertsonian fusion mutations (Searle 1984). This hypothesis is supported by comparisons with other species of Sorex (Meylan and Hausser 1973, Wójcik and Searle 1988, Volobouev and Catzeflis 1989). An alternative hypothesis is that the observed metacentrics were formed either by Robertsonian fusions of acrocentrics, or by whole-arm reciprocal translocations between different metacentrics (Halkka at al.…”
Section: Relationships Between Polish and Other European Racessupporting
confidence: 59%
“…An unusually extensive Robertsonian variability has been found in this species. It is assumed that the main mutations involved in karyotypic variation in the common shrew are centric fuskns (Searle 1984, Wójcik and Searle 1988, Volobouev and Catzeflis 1989, Zima 1991.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genome-wide chromosomal correspondence among the three taxa studied here is well established (e.g., Volobouev 1989, Volobouev & Catzeflis 1989. The first taxon is S. granarius, a species genetically very similar to S. araneus (Fumagalli et al 1999), which is believed to have retained the ancestral karyotype of the S. araneus group (Wójcik & Searle 1988, Volobouev 1989. Indeed, all its autosomes (except the smallest one tu) are in an acrocentric state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The diploid chromosome number (2n) varies from 20 to 33, with the number of autosomal arms the same all over the species range (FNa = 40). It has been suggested that the ancestral karyotype of the common shrew consisted mostly of uniarmed (acrocentric) chromosomes [7]. The consecutive fixation of various centric or Robertsonian fusions (Rbs) and whole-arm reciprocal translocations (WARTs) gave rise a wide variety of combinations of biarmed (metacentric) and acrocentric chromosomes in extant chromosome races.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%