1994
DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06256.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The chromatin-associated protein H-NS alters DNA topology in vitro.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
163
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
17
163
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These architectural changes could involve DNA flexibility (the proU promoter is activated by increased DNA flexibility; 41) and/or DNA looping. There is accumulating evidence that H-NS distorts DNA, although the nature of this distortion is unclear: H-NS can constrain DNA supercoils in vitro (5), it can act at a distance in vivo (13,17,28), and it generates DNase I-hypersensitive sites on binding (5,13,16). Although proU is simpler than other H-NS-dependent promoters, in that it does not appear to require additional trans-acting factors, there is no a priori reason why similar mechanisms should not operate at many other H-NS-dependent promoters; positive regulators may alter local promoter architecture to overcome H-NS repression (42).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These architectural changes could involve DNA flexibility (the proU promoter is activated by increased DNA flexibility; 41) and/or DNA looping. There is accumulating evidence that H-NS distorts DNA, although the nature of this distortion is unclear: H-NS can constrain DNA supercoils in vitro (5), it can act at a distance in vivo (13,17,28), and it generates DNase I-hypersensitive sites on binding (5,13,16). Although proU is simpler than other H-NS-dependent promoters, in that it does not appear to require additional trans-acting factors, there is no a priori reason why similar mechanisms should not operate at many other H-NS-dependent promoters; positive regulators may alter local promoter architecture to overcome H-NS repression (42).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it may be that curved DNA sequence elements are required for the action of H-NS at all promoters (15)(16)(17). However, for the limited number of DNA curves studied, the increased preference for curved DNA, compared with nonspecific binding to generic DNA, is only a few-fold (5,12,13,18). Furthermore, as curved DNA sequences are found near most promoters, including many promoters that are not responsive to H-NS (for review see Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been unclear as to how H-NS binds to such sites, but recently it was demonstrated that H-NS itself can bend DNA and this property could be utilized when H-NS interacts with DNA that is not naturally curved (Spurio et al, 1997). The superhelical status of the DNA does not influence H-NS binding (Spassky et al, 1984;Tupper et al, 1994) and H-NS retains the same ability to repress transcription within the range of superhelical densities normally present in the cell .…”
Section: Dna Bindingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loss of the other major nucleoid-associated proteins, HU and H-NS, results in a decrease (Tanaka et al, 1995;Paull and Johnson, 1995) and an increase ; but see Yasuzawa et al, 1992), respectively, in negative superhelicity in vivo. However, both of these proteins at subsaturating concentrations constrain negative supercoils in vitro (Rouvière-Yaniv et al, 1979;Broyles and Pettijohn, 1986;Tupper et al, 1994). Furthermore, it is known that FIS is a transcriptional regulator of the hupA/hupB and hns promoters (Claret and Rouviè re-Yaniv, 1996;Falconi et al, 1996).…”
Section: Biological Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%