Routledge Handbook of the Chinese Diaspora
DOI: 10.4324/9780203100387.ch13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Chinese in South Asia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 18th and 19th centuries provided a conducive environment in the form of colonial and manpower networks along with the domestic turmoil and fewer opportunities in China, serving as the catalyst for the major migration of Chinese nationals mostly to South East Asia. Later, a smaller number moved to to South Asia, and the Indian port of Calcutta (Kolkata) served as the major receiver in connecting China with British India (Xing and Sen, 2013), as by then there was a firm imperial division between the British Indian and Chinese territories which was not porous. The Chinese were thereby confined to businesses such as carpentry, tanneries, shoe making, dentistry, beauty parlors, and silk trading in the cities of Calcutta and Bombay (Xing and Sen, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The 18th and 19th centuries provided a conducive environment in the form of colonial and manpower networks along with the domestic turmoil and fewer opportunities in China, serving as the catalyst for the major migration of Chinese nationals mostly to South East Asia. Later, a smaller number moved to to South Asia, and the Indian port of Calcutta (Kolkata) served as the major receiver in connecting China with British India (Xing and Sen, 2013), as by then there was a firm imperial division between the British Indian and Chinese territories which was not porous. The Chinese were thereby confined to businesses such as carpentry, tanneries, shoe making, dentistry, beauty parlors, and silk trading in the cities of Calcutta and Bombay (Xing and Sen, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, a smaller number moved to to South Asia, and the Indian port of Calcutta (Kolkata) served as the major receiver in connecting China with British India (Xing and Sen, 2013), as by then there was a firm imperial division between the British Indian and Chinese territories which was not porous. The Chinese were thereby confined to businesses such as carpentry, tanneries, shoe making, dentistry, beauty parlors, and silk trading in the cities of Calcutta and Bombay (Xing and Sen, 2013). The British also remain responsible for bringing Chinese laborers into India and employing them in the tea gardens of Assam, Darjeeling, and Kalimpong due to their expertise in tea plantation and carpentry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the 1962 war and its repercussions attracted the prime focus of the discussions on the community and had been the focus of much academic literature and memoirs (Banerjee 2019; D’Souza and Ma 2020; Li 2011; Marsh 2015). Many scholars have studied the socio-economic and cultural aspects of the migrant community who are settled in Kolkata and other parts (Oxfeld 2007; Pan 2014; Sen 2007; Xing 2011; Xing and Sen 2013). As the 1962 war had a direct and significant impact on the community, we assume there was no continuity with the colonial period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%