Penrose and Smith (1966) have estimated that about three-fifths of all clinical mongolism is caused by some process closely related to ageing of the ovum (the age-dependent group), while the other two-fifths (age-independent) includes the socalled hereditary causes and some strongly suggestive instances of environmental origin. The relative proportion of cases in the two classes differs from one country to another and from one study to another. It has also been reconfirmed recently (Sigler et al., 1965) March 10, 1969. at maternal age 35 or over. The parent control group consisted of 33 parent pairs, each with at least two nonmongol offspring. Maternal age of 35 years at time of conception was made the dividing line between agedependent and age-independent mongolism, since the risk of affected offspring increases markedly at this maternal age, according to Benda (1960).The total dermal index of Walker (1958) was used without any modifications for the dermatoglyphic analyses on individuals with mongolism, their parents, and the parents in the control group. The dermal areas studied in this total dermal index are 10 digital patterns, the position of two palmar axial triradii, two interdigital patterns, and two plantar hallucal patterns. A single total dermal index was obtained from hand and foot prints obtained from each individual; standard ink or inkless methods were used (Cummins and Midlo, 1961). The total index was originally based on the frequencies of mongol to control dermal patterns, expressed as logarithms (Walker, 1958). Mongol patterns are more positive. In this investigation the dermal indexes in the various study subgroups were compared, using the Student's t test to evaluate the significance of differences. A p value of 0 05 or less was considered significant.
ResultsReliability of Total Dermal Index. To ascertain that the total dermal index was a reliable measure of clinical mongolism in the population studied in this report, histograms were prepared of the total dermal indexes of the 68 mongols in the study, and the 66 parents in the control group (Fig. 1). It can be seen that there are no normal (non-mongol) individuals who score +3 or more, and there are no individuals with clinical mongolism who score -3 or less. The range of overlap between + 3 and -3 included approximately 30%/o of both groups, while about 70%, of mongols and 70%0 of non-mongols fell, respectively, above or below this range. The resemblance of the histograms for this study to those originally prepared by Walker (1958) is striking. It was felt that the index was a reliable measure of clinical mongolism in the present study group.