2017
DOI: 10.1111/chso.12211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Child of the Common: Governing Children in the Freetown Christiania, Denmark

Abstract: Children in the intentional community of Christiania, Denmark, are seen as belonging to a flock. They experience a relatively high degree of freedom and autonomy as well as collective supervision/control. Departing from Foucault's conceptualisation of pastoral power and interviews conducted in Christiania, this article explores what the idea of the child as belonging to the common/collective may imply for the governance of children. A unique combination of freedom and supervision, individualism and collectivis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mattei and Quarta (2015) provide the example of an abandoned factory in Pisa, Italy, that was occupied and transformed into a library, tailor, school for migrants, nursery school, bicycle mechanic, farmers market, restaurant, and gym. Denmark’s “Freetown” of Christiania is another example, where housing-stressed families occupied an unused military base and built their own housing (Wasshede, 2017). Where communities feel that the state or private owner is not caring for a space, they occupy it, reasserting a more localized control and challenging the state by evoking “squatter’s rights” through “temporary use” laws.…”
Section: Commoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mattei and Quarta (2015) provide the example of an abandoned factory in Pisa, Italy, that was occupied and transformed into a library, tailor, school for migrants, nursery school, bicycle mechanic, farmers market, restaurant, and gym. Denmark’s “Freetown” of Christiania is another example, where housing-stressed families occupied an unused military base and built their own housing (Wasshede, 2017). Where communities feel that the state or private owner is not caring for a space, they occupy it, reasserting a more localized control and challenging the state by evoking “squatter’s rights” through “temporary use” laws.…”
Section: Commoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In challenging the privatised dwelling, a more participatory approach to housing also suggests cultivating 'public time', in sharing spaces, time, and the work involved in upholding home and daily life as a collective engagement (Jarvis 2011). More collaborative forms of living might also challenge traditional household configurations and gender norms (as explored by among others Vestbro and Horelli 2012), with the potential to renegotiate social relations and aspects of for example child-rearing as part of a common undertaking (Wasshede 2017).…”
Section: Feminist Re-imaginations Of Everyday Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fe mi nis tische For schungs pers pek tiven auf gemeinschaftliches Wohnen setzen sich hauptsächlich mit linken Wohnprojekten in besetzten Häusern, Wagen burgen und Frau en pro jek ten auseinander (vgl. amantine 2011, Becker 2009, Becker/Linke 2015, Wasshede 2017. Selbstorganisierte Wohnformen sind aller dings längst kein subkulturelles Phänomen mehr (vgl.…”
Section: Forschungsstandunclassified