Home constitutes a key part of the everyday, the mundane and familiar, but also provides a basis for our aspirations and visions of what kind of life we wish to lead -and by extension, what kind of society we construct. How we construct home (physically, socially, and cognitively), as part of how we conceive our relation to society and the planet, has significant implications for the social and environmental impact of residential development.A critical understanding of the domestic, and the potential of the everyday, has been recognised in calls for both local and society-wide transitions from a perspective of the 'home front' (Gibson-Graham 1993;Astyk 2013), and proposes going beyond the four walls of the private dwelling to acknowledge the diverse transformative practices needed to challenge dominant norms and lock-ins. The perspective put forward in this chapter emphasises housing for degrowth as rejecting Western bourgeois and consumerist representations of home, and instead presents alternative housing practices, with examples from Sweden, which challenge a high-consuming culture of indebtedness and neoliberalisation of housing, and that reimagine home as a collaborative, decommodified and feminist engagement with people and place, and as a node for transitions to a low-impact society.
Finding homeThe notion of home has been a well-explored topic in Western poetry, music and literature throughout the last centuries. Just one of many examples is the stanza from the early 19 th century song "Home, Sweet Home" by American lyricist John Howard Payne: "Mid pleasures and palaces though we may roam, be it ever so humble, there's no place like home."