2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2014.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Chicago Classification of Motility Disorders

Abstract: Synopsis The Chicago Classification defines esophageal motility disorders in high resolution manometry using Clouse plots. This is based on individual scoring of 10 swallows performed in supine position. The update version of the Chicago Classification, named Chicago Classification v3.0, has many new revisions that will improve and simplify the current version. Disorders of EGJ outflow obstruction are defined by a median integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) above the limit of normal and further divided into 3 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
48
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the HRM study, the median (interquartile) basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure, DCI, and rate of successful primary peristalsis were 7.7 (3.6-27) mm Hg, 1,237.1 (349.1-6,158.1) mm Hg-s-cm, and 30.0% (10-100), respectively. Based on the Chicago classification version 3 [17], 6 patients were diagnosed with ineffective esophageal motility.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the HRM study, the median (interquartile) basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure, DCI, and rate of successful primary peristalsis were 7.7 (3.6-27) mm Hg, 1,237.1 (349.1-6,158.1) mm Hg-s-cm, and 30.0% (10-100), respectively. Based on the Chicago classification version 3 [17], 6 patients were diagnosed with ineffective esophageal motility.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, since completion of this study an updated Chicago classification version 3 has been published. 26 One of the primary changes in this classification is the inclusion of small peristaltic breaks (i.e less than 5cm) as a normal manometric finding. In fact, this change is congruous with our findings as patients with small peristaltic breaks mirrored the demographics, presenting symptoms, and the natural history of those with normal esophageal manometry studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oesophageal dysphagia might also arise from abnormalities in the oesophageal body and the LES, including primary or secondary motility disorders. 81 However, our knowledge of the relationship between abnormal motor function and oesophageal dysphagia symptoms is limited, as is our understanding of the intrinsic mechanisms and neurotransmitters involved in the control of oesophageal peristalsis and LES relaxation. 75,76,82 Research into these two aspects will be critical to understand the pathophysiology of symptoms of oesophageal dysphagia and develop effective pharmacologic treatments for patients.…”
Section: Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…101,102 This classification has been defined as the Chicago Classification and has been periodically revised by the International GI Motility and Function Working Group. 81 Impaired LES relaxation and absent peristalsis in the oesophageal body are found in all types of achalasia; type I achalasia is characterized by low intra-oesophageal pressure as a consequence of oesophageal dilation; type II is defined as achalasia with compression and is characterized by pan-oesophageal pressurization >30 mmHg, minimal oesophageal dilation and good response to dilation or surgical treatment; 101 and type III achalasia (also known as achalasia with distal spasm or 'vigorous achalasia') is associated with high amplitude simultaneous contractions, functional obstruction of the distal oesophagus and poor response to all therapies.…”
Section: Mechanical Causesmentioning
confidence: 99%