2014
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0

Abstract: Background The Chicago Classification (CC) of esophageal motility disorders, utilizing an algorithmic scheme to analyze clinical high-resolution manometry (HRM) studies, has gained acceptance worldwide. Purpose This 2014 update, CC v3.0, developed by the International HRM Working Group, incorporated the extensive clinical experience and interval publications since the prior (2011) version. Key results CC v3.0 utilizes a hierarchical approach, sequentially prioritizing: 1) disorders of esophagogastric junct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
1,361
2
78

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,655 publications
(1,453 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(68 reference statements)
12
1,361
2
78
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, sHRM devices consist of 36 circumferential sensors that provide rapid response rates and allow a detailed study of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and the EGJ. Normal values as established by the Chicago Classification were defined using sHRM (34)(35)(36). pHRM has the advantage of a more durable probe.…”
Section: High-resolution Manometry Of the Esophagusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, sHRM devices consist of 36 circumferential sensors that provide rapid response rates and allow a detailed study of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and the EGJ. Normal values as established by the Chicago Classification were defined using sHRM (34)(35)(36). pHRM has the advantage of a more durable probe.…”
Section: High-resolution Manometry Of the Esophagusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, advantages have been identified in certain situations with the patient sitting (39) and using a solid bolus or standardized food (40)(41)(42). Although some studies have been published with reference values under these conditions (43,44), such conditions are not common and are not covered by the CCH, which is most commonly used to define esophageal motor disorders (3,31). The fact that the reference values vary significantly depending on the position (recumbent/sitting) at rest ( Fig.…”
Section: Current Situationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard HRM protocol is designed for a patient in a recumbent position and with liquid swallows (3,37,38). However, advantages have been identified in certain situations with the patient sitting (39) and using a solid bolus or standardized food (40)(41)(42).…”
Section: Current Situationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Combining the pattern of esophageal peristaltis with the behaviour of LES during each swallow, the Chicago classification v3.0 defines achalasia, aperistaltis, distal esophageal spasm and jackhammer esophagus as major disorders (can never be seen in normal individuals), while ineffective motility (IEM) and fragmented peristaltis are considered minor disorders, (abnormal patterns, which can be found in asymptomatic individuals) (9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%