2006
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-3598-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Chemistry of the Actinide and Transactinide Elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 451 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The actinides do not however easily yield their secrets or succumb to simple description. The opposing trends of energetic and spatial contributions to orbital mixing behavior across the 5f series, as well as the emerging prominence of scalar relativistic and spin–orbit effects in chemical behavior, yield a series unamenable to description via traditional models and resistant to predictions reliant on monotonic periodic changes. Instead, understanding the actinides requires the synthesis of multiple theoretical models and consideration not just of ionic radius or simple rules but of real changes in bonding along the series. Perhaps the model whose conceptual underpinnings cause the most trouble in the actinides is “covalency.” The standard dichotomy has a spectrum running between ionic and covalent bonding, where ionic bonds involve localized electrons and covalent bonds have more mixed molecular orbitals and more shared electrons which stabilize the bond by concentrating in the internuclear space. The actinides disrupt this binary, mixing 5f and ligand orbitals by energetic matching without much spatial overlap, resulting in bonds with delocalized electrons but little internuclear charge concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actinides do not however easily yield their secrets or succumb to simple description. The opposing trends of energetic and spatial contributions to orbital mixing behavior across the 5f series, as well as the emerging prominence of scalar relativistic and spin–orbit effects in chemical behavior, yield a series unamenable to description via traditional models and resistant to predictions reliant on monotonic periodic changes. Instead, understanding the actinides requires the synthesis of multiple theoretical models and consideration not just of ionic radius or simple rules but of real changes in bonding along the series. Perhaps the model whose conceptual underpinnings cause the most trouble in the actinides is “covalency.” The standard dichotomy has a spectrum running between ionic and covalent bonding, where ionic bonds involve localized electrons and covalent bonds have more mixed molecular orbitals and more shared electrons which stabilize the bond by concentrating in the internuclear space. The actinides disrupt this binary, mixing 5f and ligand orbitals by energetic matching without much spatial overlap, resulting in bonds with delocalized electrons but little internuclear charge concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon is common in lanthanide and actinide systems alike, and therefore, attempts to elucidate the mechanism governing oxalate formation were not made. We only speculate that decomposition of the TBA molecules and conversion to oxalate occurred and were mediated by a combination of the acidic conditions and α radiolysis caused by the high-energy nuclear decay of the 243 Am metal centers (α = 5.277 MeV) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precipitation of actinides was achieved almost 50 years ago using BiPO4 by the process of co-precipitation of Pu and Np [9]. This process does not quantitatively remove any element due to solubility limitations and precipitates other metals, such as zirconium, which form insoluble phosphates.…”
Section: Resulting Waste Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%