2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2105.01661
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The chemical make-up of the Sun: A 2020 vision

M. Asplund,
A. M. Amarsi,
N. Grevesse

Abstract: Context. The chemical composition of the Sun is a fundamental yardstick in astronomy, relative to which essentially all cosmic objects are referenced. As such, having an accurate knowledge of the solar elemental abundances is crucial for an extremely broad range of topics. Aims. We reassess the solar abundances of all 83 long-lived elements, using highly realistic solar modelling and state-of-the-art spectroscopic analysis techniques coupled with the best available atomic data and observations. Methods. The ba… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
51
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 246 publications
(453 reference statements)
8
51
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This mixing can influence, for example, observed surface lithium abundances in the Sun and solar-type stars, which align poorly with theoretical predictions (Pinsonneault 1997;Carlos et al 2019;Dumont et al 2021). Furthermore, modern spectroscopic observations suggest a lower solar metallicity than previously thought, and models computed with modern metallicity estimates and opacity tables have shallower convection zones than helioseismic observations suggest (Basu & Antia 2004;Bahcall et al 2005;Bergemann & Serenelli 2014;Vinyoles et al 2017;Asplund et al 2021); modeling and observational discrepancies can be reduced with additional mixing below the convective boundary (Christensen-Dalsgaard et al 2011).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This mixing can influence, for example, observed surface lithium abundances in the Sun and solar-type stars, which align poorly with theoretical predictions (Pinsonneault 1997;Carlos et al 2019;Dumont et al 2021). Furthermore, modern spectroscopic observations suggest a lower solar metallicity than previously thought, and models computed with modern metallicity estimates and opacity tables have shallower convection zones than helioseismic observations suggest (Basu & Antia 2004;Bahcall et al 2005;Bergemann & Serenelli 2014;Vinyoles et al 2017;Asplund et al 2021); modeling and observational discrepancies can be reduced with additional mixing below the convective boundary (Christensen-Dalsgaard et al 2011).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…3 On the other hand, in hot ( 1000 K) hydrogen-dominated atmospheres, photodissociation of CO contributes to the formation of additional CO 2 in the upper atmosphere (e.g., Moses et al 2011;Venot et al 2012) 4: Atmospheric metallicity (a) and C/O ratio (b) derived from the standard disequilibrium retrieval (blue circle points), equilibrium retrieval (orange triangle points), disequilibrium retrieval with same K zz (green square points), and T int -fixed disequilibrium retrieval (red diamond points; only shown for the planets with masses larger than half Jupiter mass). The solar metallicity and C/O ratio from the solar photospheric elemental abundance ratios of Asplund et al (2021) are marked with dotted lines for reference. photodissociation of CH 4 forms both CO 2 and CO at high altitudes (e.g., Miller-Ricci Kempton et al 2012;Kawashima & Ikoma 2018).…”
Section: Effect Of Photochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical composition of the Sun is often used as a yardstick in computing the metal content of other stars. However, the exact value remains inconclusive and has undergone several revisions since 2004 (see Basu 2009;Asplund et al 2021, for an overview). Therefore, different stellar models often make use of different abundance scales.…”
Section: Chemical Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%