2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The chemical compositions of accreted and in situ galactic globular clusters according to SDSS/APOGEE

Abstract: Studies of the kinematics and chemical compositions of Galactic globular clusters (GCs) enable the reconstruction of the history of star formation, chemical evolution, and mass assembly of the Galaxy. Using the latest data release (DR16) of the SDSS/APOGEE survey, we identify 3,090 stars associated with 46 GCs. Using a previously defined kinematic association, we break the sample down into eight separate groups and examine how the kinematics-based classification maps into chemical composition space, considerin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
58
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(109 reference statements)
5
58
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ferraro et al 1999;Pritzl et al 2005). Figure 3 in Horta et al (2020), for example, shows that clusters with [Fe/H]< −0.7 have more or less constant [Si/Fe] of about [Si/Fe]= +0.25, followed by a downturn in the [Si/Fe] values similar to what is seen for field stars. The two most metal-rich clusters in their sample (Liller 1 and Pal 10) have [Si/Fe] of 0.01 ± 0.05 and 0.0 ± 0.10, respectively, i.e., they are compatible with a solar abundance ratio.…”
Section: Comparison With Stellar Evolution Modelsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Ferraro et al 1999;Pritzl et al 2005). Figure 3 in Horta et al (2020), for example, shows that clusters with [Fe/H]< −0.7 have more or less constant [Si/Fe] of about [Si/Fe]= +0.25, followed by a downturn in the [Si/Fe] values similar to what is seen for field stars. The two most metal-rich clusters in their sample (Liller 1 and Pal 10) have [Si/Fe] of 0.01 ± 0.05 and 0.0 ± 0.10, respectively, i.e., they are compatible with a solar abundance ratio.…”
Section: Comparison With Stellar Evolution Modelsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In practice, this means that we exclude E3 from our analysis (also because of its low mass), and consider versions of the low-energy group both including and excluding NGC 6441. Finally, Horta et al (2020b) argue that NGC 6121, which Massari et al (2019) associate with the low-energy group, has an in-situ origin. Based on the age and metallicity of NGC 6121 (τ = 12.2 ± 0.5 Gyr and [Fe/H] = −1.14), we consider it too metal poor to have formed in situ and follow the choice of Massari et al (2019) to associate it with the low-energy group, even if we acknowledge that this is an edge case.…”
Section: Definition Of the Observational Samplementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Therefore, we favor for the suggestion that no obvious difference between the low-α and high-α groups is found in this diagram. The energy of MRSK stars is above the low boundary of the GSE galaxy at E tot /10 5 ∼ −1.9 km 2 s −2 , although its metal poor component lies at E tot /10 5 ∼ −1.5 km 2 s −2 according to Horta et al [46]. In addition, the energy of the GSE galaxy is significantly lower than the Sgr galaxy at E tot /10 5 ∼ −1.0 km 2 s −2 according to Naidu et al [14] (see their Figure 23).…”
Section: The L Z Versus E Tot Diagrammentioning
confidence: 92%