2000
DOI: 10.1053/jpmn.2000.5831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The checklist of nonverbal pain indicators (CNPI)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
183
1
12

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 326 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
9
183
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…[34] The tool addresses the unique needs of the demented population and shows preliminary validity and modest reliability with cognitively impaired older adults in the acute care setting; however, additional refinement and evaluation with larger samples in diverse settings is needed to determine its utility with the demented older adult in acute and chronic pain.…”
Section: Observational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[34] The tool addresses the unique needs of the demented population and shows preliminary validity and modest reliability with cognitively impaired older adults in the acute care setting; however, additional refinement and evaluation with larger samples in diverse settings is needed to determine its utility with the demented older adult in acute and chronic pain.…”
Section: Observational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even when evaluated for use among cognitively impaired elderly patients, the VDS demonstrates a 73% completion rate. [34] The present pain inventory (PPI) is another VDS, which uses the adjectives none, mild, discomforting, distressing, horrible, and excruciating to describe pain. [86] The PPI demonstrates good validity and is feasible for older patients, including those with mild to moderate cognitive impairment, with completion rates up to 65% [39] [99] [121] [127]; however, some researchers note more difficulty with its use by cognitively impaired persons when compared with a descriptor scale with simpler vocabulary.…”
Section: Verbal Descriptor Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To develop items for the Pain Behaviors for the Osteoarthritis Instrument for Cognitively Impaired Elders (PBOICIE), the first author compiled pain behaviors from other observational instruments (Dirks et al, 1993;Feldt, 2000;Kerns et al, 1991;Richards et al, 1982) and OA pain assessment instruments (Keefe et al, 1987), as well as pain behaviors suggested by the American Geriatrics Society panel (AGS Panel on Persistent Pain in Older Persons, 2002) and past studies (Weiner et al, 1999). Six content experts in long-term care, orthopedic care, and pain research used a 5-point scale (0=definitely not a pain behavior to 4=definitely a pain behavior) to rate each item's relevance to pain in severely CI elders with OA of the knee or hip.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These provide indications of whether the elder is experiencing OA knee or hip pain. Current methods for assessing CI elders, however, do not address these indicators of OA (Feldt, 2000;Simons & Malabar, 1995;Snow et al, 2003;Weiner et al, 1999).While an observational tool is available to identify OA pain in the general population, including elders (Keefe et al, 1987), there is no such instrument for CI elders with OA. Current measurement tools for osteoarthritic pain have not been tested with CI elders and no one has systematically studied pain behaviors in CI elders with OA of the knee or hip.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation