2016
DOI: 10.1080/07329113.2016.1223969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Charter of the Kanak People: in pursuit of “cooperative and balanced legal pluralism” in New Caledonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New actors have entered the arena (multinational companies such as INCO and Falconbrige, now Vale and Glencore, big international NGOs like CI, WWF, PEW, indigenous and environmental associations), new discourses are mobilized (corporate social responsibility, sustainable development, indigenous rights, conservation and environmentalism), and new arenas and regulations appear (ICMM, UNDRIP, etc .). However, the recently issued Kanak People's Charter (2014) provides a constitutional matrix on the basis of which Kanak law and sovereignty (internal or external) could be asserted (see Dickins Morrison 2016 for an analysis of the Charter in terms of legal pluralism).…”
Section: Conclusion: Sovereign Pluralism In the New Caledonian Decolo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…New actors have entered the arena (multinational companies such as INCO and Falconbrige, now Vale and Glencore, big international NGOs like CI, WWF, PEW, indigenous and environmental associations), new discourses are mobilized (corporate social responsibility, sustainable development, indigenous rights, conservation and environmentalism), and new arenas and regulations appear (ICMM, UNDRIP, etc .). However, the recently issued Kanak People's Charter (2014) provides a constitutional matrix on the basis of which Kanak law and sovereignty (internal or external) could be asserted (see Dickins Morrison 2016 for an analysis of the Charter in terms of legal pluralism).…”
Section: Conclusion: Sovereign Pluralism In the New Caledonian Decolo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent adoption of the ‘Charter of the Kanak People on the Common Foundation of Fundamental Values and Principles of the Kanak Civilisation’ (Sénat Coutumier 2014) helps grasp how the affirmation of the inherent collective rights and sovereignty of the Kanak people generated legal work in which the underlying principles of up‐to‐now informal norms and practices are formalized. Customary authorities also advocated for that Charter's formal inclusion in any future constitutional arrangement following the Noumea Accord process (Demmer and Trépied 2017; Dickins Morrison 2016).…”
Section: Decolonization and Sovereign Pluralism In New Caledoniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the proposal perpetuates the great divide between native sujets (subjects) and citoyens (citizens) in terms of their rights and obligations under colonial rule. In an article on legal pluralism in New Caledonia, Dickins Morrison (2016: 484–486) gives a clear summary of their main argument:Demmer and Salomon (2013) maintain that the courts are fixing Kanak identity and “values” in law in an essentialist, reductionist and regressive way, which fails to take into account the continual transformation of Kanak society and social norms, contemporary realities, and the multiplicity of Kanak identities and modes of life today. Moreover, these authors argue that “judicial custom” represents a new source of social discrimination and violence rather than a victory over the denial of Kanak difference, because it reinforces certain power relations within Kanak society and penalizes the most vulnerable and dominated members thereof, such as women, youth, homosexuals, and men and clans of low social rank in the customary hierarchy.…”
Section: Conclusion: “Criticism Is Easy But Art Is Difficult”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… On the complex socio and political situation of present‐day New Caledonia see, among others, Leblic and Cugola (2018); also Bensa et al (2017), Demmer and Trepied (2017), Faberon (2013), Chappell (2013), Faugere and Merle (2010), Mokaddem (2009), Bensa (1999), Dickins‐Morrison (2016). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%