1973
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9904-1973-13269-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The characters of the binary modular congruence group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Precise definitions of these surfaces and their Cheeger constants are given in Section 5. Using probabilistic methods, Brooks and Zuk in [6] showed that h(Γ N \H) ≤ 0.4402 for sufficiently large N. From (i) of Theorem 3 and inequality (12) in Section 4 we have a sharper bound for the cases N = 3, 3 2 , and 5 r . Further, we have:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Precise definitions of these surfaces and their Cheeger constants are given in Section 5. Using probabilistic methods, Brooks and Zuk in [6] showed that h(Γ N \H) ≤ 0.4402 for sufficiently large N. From (i) of Theorem 3 and inequality (12) in Section 4 we have a sharper bound for the cases N = 3, 3 2 , and 5 r . Further, we have:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For other rings, in particular for R = Z N with N composite, the representations of GL 2 (R) and SL 2 (R) are more complicated. See [12] for a study of the characters of SL 2 (Z p n ), for example.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, these algebras are the Lie algebras of the corresponding group, with SL 2 , p = 2 being a notable exception, as we will see below. For SL 2 with p = 2 this method was employed by Kutzko in his thesis (unpublished, see the announcement [17]) and by Shalika (whose results remained unpublished until recently, cf. [29]).…”
Section: The Unramified Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a series of papers by Nobs, and Nobs and Wolfart [21,22,[24][25][26], these constructions are generalized in several directions: some of the constructions are applied for p = 2, some of them are valid when Z p is replaced by any ring of integers of a local field, and some are applied to GL 2 . Other publications which do not use the Weil representation include: Kutzko [16] and Nagornyȋ [20] for SL 2 (Z/p Z), Silberger [29] for PGL 2 (o ) and Shalika [28] for SL 2 (o ) when o has characteristic zero. In a more recent paper [13], Jaikin-Zapirain computes the representation zeta function for SL 2 (o) in the case of odd characteristic.…”
Section: History Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%