2006
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200503720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Characterization of Weak Protein–Protein Interactions: Evidence from DEER for the Trimerization of a von Willebrand Factor A Domain in Solution

Abstract: Using double electron electron resonance (DEER) spectroscopy, a distance of 6.15 nm is measured between the nitroxide labels of von Willebrand Factor A domains. The picture shows the DEER spectrum and the trimeric structure of the protein that is deduced from the DEER results. For more information see the Communication by G. Jeschke and co-workers on the following pages.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pulsed electron-electron double resonance (PELDOR) experiments for the determination of distances between paramagnetic centers [l, 2] have recently become a very active field of research with numerous applications on nanostructured materials [3][4][5][6][7][8], soluble proteins [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], membrane proteins [18][19][20][21], nucleic acids [22], and peptides [23]. In many of these studies, careful analysis of the dipolar evolution data was recognized asa crucial precondition for their reliable interpretation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pulsed electron-electron double resonance (PELDOR) experiments for the determination of distances between paramagnetic centers [l, 2] have recently become a very active field of research with numerous applications on nanostructured materials [3][4][5][6][7][8], soluble proteins [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], membrane proteins [18][19][20][21], nucleic acids [22], and peptides [23]. In many of these studies, careful analysis of the dipolar evolution data was recognized asa crucial precondition for their reliable interpretation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The perturbation causes a change in the dipolar field of the detected spin and results in a modulation of the time-domain spin echo signal as a function of the dipolar frequency. At low EPR frequencies (X band), this method has been successfully applied in structural biology to measure distances between native cofactors in proteins, such as those of photosystem II (13), hydrogenase (14), RNR (10,15,16), sulfhydryl oxidases (17), and pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase (18) or, by using nitroxide spin labels, to determine distances in RNA (19), DNA (20), and membrane proteins (21,22). A very early study by Larsen and Singel (23) investigated the effect of orientation dependence in PELDOR at low fields using nitroxide spin labels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Monte Carlo simulations of homogeneous distributions either only the distance (test of Eqs. (13) and (14)) or the distance and angles h g between the magnetic field and the unique axis of the Dy 3+ g tensor and h between the magnetic field and the spin-spin vector were varied.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With commercial hardware and without isotope labeling such methods can routinely access the distance range between 1.8 and 5 nm, which fits well to the size of the target structures. Double-quantum techniques combined with dedicated hardware [4] may allow for an extension to somewhat shorter distances while deuterium exchange of the matrix allows for an extension to longer distances [11][12][13], in favorable cases up to 8 nm [14]. Good-quality measurements can be performed on samples with spin label concentrations down to about 50 lM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%