2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.theochem.2004.07.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The characterization of stationary points in the potential energy surface of difluoromethane dimer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the monomer as reference, it is seen that while the establishment of N-H⋅ ⋅ ⋅N interaction promotes the lengthening of the N-H covalent bond, the formation of C-H⋅ ⋅ ⋅N interactions leads to a shortening of the C-H covalent bond. This distinct behaviour of the N-H and C-H covalent bonds has already been observed, both experimentally and theoretically, for other hydrogen bonded molecular clusters [11,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33], and has been correlated with a balance between two main effects that act in opposite directions. One is the net electron density gain in the X-H bond region, that promotes a contraction of the covalent X-H bond, and the other is the attractive interaction between the positively charged hydrogen atom and the electron rich acceptor N-atom, which leads to lengthening of Figure 4: Comparison of the CP-uncorrected and CP-corrected CEHB values predicted by the B97D calculations for the O3d (which assembles the most stable geometry predicted for trimeric water clusters [25,26]), O3a, and O4a iPram clusters.…”
Section: Structural Analysissupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Considering the monomer as reference, it is seen that while the establishment of N-H⋅ ⋅ ⋅N interaction promotes the lengthening of the N-H covalent bond, the formation of C-H⋅ ⋅ ⋅N interactions leads to a shortening of the C-H covalent bond. This distinct behaviour of the N-H and C-H covalent bonds has already been observed, both experimentally and theoretically, for other hydrogen bonded molecular clusters [11,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33], and has been correlated with a balance between two main effects that act in opposite directions. One is the net electron density gain in the X-H bond region, that promotes a contraction of the covalent X-H bond, and the other is the attractive interaction between the positively charged hydrogen atom and the electron rich acceptor N-atom, which leads to lengthening of Figure 4: Comparison of the CP-uncorrected and CP-corrected CEHB values predicted by the B97D calculations for the O3d (which assembles the most stable geometry predicted for trimeric water clusters [25,26]), O3a, and O4a iPram clusters.…”
Section: Structural Analysissupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The few rotationally resolved investigations of molecular adducts in which the monomers are held together by CH⋅⋅⋅F and CH⋅⋅⋅O WHBs have shown the specificity and directionality of these interactions 4–9. For example, the dimer of difluoromethane is stabilized only by CH⋅⋅⋅F bridges4 and several theoretical investigations have been reported on this type of interaction 1012…”
Section: Spectroscopic Constants For Adduct Ch3f⋅chf3[a]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is called an “improper H-bond”, and one of the main characteristic of them is the blue shift of the νXH stretching frequencies [45,46,47,48]. The nature of the C–H⋯F–C bond in different fluoromethanes was studied by Kryachko et al [49] and Ebrahimi et al [50]; these studies demonstrated the improper H-bond character of the C–H proton donor induced by the presence of the fluorine atom. A systematic analysis of these “improper H-bonds”, for the molecular class of CH2X2, which would include also chlorine, bromine, and iodine atoms, could not be found in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%