2011
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-12-41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The characterization of a new set of EST-derived simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers as a resource for the genetic analysis of Phaseolus vulgaris

Abstract: BackgroundOver recent years, a growing effort has been made to develop microsatellite markers for the genomic analysis of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) to broaden the knowledge of the molecular genetic basis of this species. The availability of large sets of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) in public databases has given rise to an expedient approach for the identification of SSRs (Simple Sequence Repeats), specifically EST-derived SSRs. In the present work, a battery of new microsatellite markers was obta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
44
2
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
9
44
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Distinct molecular profiles for the 50 cultivars analyzed could be generated using 11 of the loci included in the analysis. The genetic diversity estimates obtained for five of these markers are consistent with the published literature (Blair et al, 2006;Buso et al, 2006;Garcia et al, 2011), validating these markers in terms of genetic content and supporting the recommendation to include these loci in an international genotyping system for common bean. The results for the remaining 19 loci, which were highly informative and demonstrated the analytical robustness of the present study, were consistent with previous reports (Garcia et al, 2011) and should also be considered for inclusion in the international genotyping set.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Distinct molecular profiles for the 50 cultivars analyzed could be generated using 11 of the loci included in the analysis. The genetic diversity estimates obtained for five of these markers are consistent with the published literature (Blair et al, 2006;Buso et al, 2006;Garcia et al, 2011), validating these markers in terms of genetic content and supporting the recommendation to include these loci in an international genotyping system for common bean. The results for the remaining 19 loci, which were highly informative and demonstrated the analytical robustness of the present study, were consistent with previous reports (Garcia et al, 2011) and should also be considered for inclusion in the international genotyping set.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Several collections of SSR markers are publicly available for molecularly characterized plant species, including common bean (Garcia et al, 2011). SSR-based molecular genotyping has rapidly evolved, and methods for the simultaneous amplification of multiple loci coupled to semi-automated detection systems have been developed (Masi et al, 2003;Borba et al, 2009;Cardoso et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most frequent N A detected per marker were three (32.56%) and four (34.88%). This is consistent with the highly conserved nature of the primer sequences flanking the SSR region, which is higher than that previously reported in some plant species such as Phaseolus vulgaris (Garcia et al, 2011). H O and H E ranged from 0.0 to 0.983 (mean 0.458) and 0.096 to 0.774 (mean 0.536), respectively.…”
Section: Primer Development and Validationsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Over the years, the goal has been to develop universal and robust genetic identification systems to analyze genetic relationships individual identification, population structure, and genetic diversity. The nine multiplex systems used in the present study consisted of 36 microsatellite markers exhibiting no evidence of linkage and were widely distributed across 11 chromosomes in the bean genome according to genetic map information (Grisi et al, 2007;Garcia et al, 2011). The number of marker sets per system ranged from 3 to 6, with an average of 4 markers per panel.…”
Section: Characterization Of Microsatellite Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%