The Characteristics of the Exergy Reference Environment and Its Implications for Sustainability-Based Decision-Making

Abstract

In the energy realm there is a pressing need to make decisions in a complex world characterized by biophysical limits. Exergy has been promoted as a preferred means of characterizing the impacts of resource consumption and waste production for the purpose of improving decision-making. This paper provides a unique and critical analysis of universal and comprehensive formulations of the chemical exergy reference environment, for the purpose of better understanding how exergy can inform decision-making. Four related insights emerged from the analysis, notably: (1) standard and universal chemical exergy reference environments necessarily encounter internal inconsistencies and even contradictions in their very formulations; (2) these inconsistencies are a result of incompatibility between the exergy reference environment and natural environment, and the desire to model the exergy reference environment after the natural environment so as to maintain analytical relevance; (3) the topics for which exergy is most appropriate as an analytical tool are not well served by comprehensive reference environments, and (4) the inconsistencies point to a need for deeper reflection of whether it is appropriate to adopt a thermodynamic frame of analysis for situations whose relevant characteristics are non-thermodynamic (e.g., to characterize scarcity). The use of comprehensive reference environments may lead to incorrect recommendations and ultimately reduce its appeal for informing decision-making. Exergy may better inform decision-making by returning to process dependent reference states that model specific processes and situations for the purpose of engineering optimization. OPEN ACCESSEnergies 2012, 5 2198

Exergy-based performance indicators for industrial practice

“…One of the principles at the base of Ahrendts's universal reference environment is that the environment should be in equilibrium. The complications of defining such an equilibrium environment are reflected in the large number of attempts made by Ahrendts to define the reference state. His finally proposed reference state has been criticized by different authors.…”

“…This universal reference state has also received critiques for different reasons. One of the critiques derives from the fact that chemical exergies of components other than the reference ones might become negative . Thus, the reference state is not entirely consistent.…”

Exergy Replacement Cost of Fossil Fuels: Closing the Carbon Cycle

“…In fact, chemical exergy is the maximum amount of work that you can produce, in this case with a hydrocarbon. It is also equal to the minimum amount of work needed to produce it from Szargut's reference state [22,23]. The difference between the ERC and chemical exergy is that the former represents the cumulative exergy required to obtain a resource using current (or best) available technology, whilst the latter is the "minimum replacement cost".…”

Life Cycle Assessment of Waste Water Treatment Plants in Ireland

“…It should be noted that the application of exergy analysis to assess environmental impact of a product or system is a relatively new concept and is currently the subject of much debate between those that advocate its use in this context [6], and those who do not [7]. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is an analytical tool that allows for a holistic approach to assessing the environmental performance of a product or system from cradle to grave [8].…”