2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The characteristics of patients with kidney light chain deposition disease concurrent with light chain amyloidosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The largest study to date on combined renal AL amyloidosis and MIDD revealed that deposits had the same LC isotype and variable domain subgroup. The authors endorse the hypothesis that subclones stemming from LC rearrangements with variants in one of the CDRs may drive the phenotypic heterogeneity [6]. A similar pathomechanism may be causing the two structurally different deposits seen in our patient although other organ‐specific factors such as different pH value or chaperones may also play a role.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The largest study to date on combined renal AL amyloidosis and MIDD revealed that deposits had the same LC isotype and variable domain subgroup. The authors endorse the hypothesis that subclones stemming from LC rearrangements with variants in one of the CDRs may drive the phenotypic heterogeneity [6]. A similar pathomechanism may be causing the two structurally different deposits seen in our patient although other organ‐specific factors such as different pH value or chaperones may also play a role.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Hypotheses on the coexistence of AL amyloidosis and MIDD include different conformations of the same pathogenic LC, subclonal somatic variants of the original LC gene or the presence of biclonal gammopathy. The largest study to date on combined renal AL amyloidosis and MIDD revealed that deposits had the same LC isotype and variable domain subgroup.The authors endorse the hypothesis that subclones stemming from LC rearrangements with variants in one of the CDRs may drive the phenotypic heterogeneity[6]. A similar pathomechanism may be causing the two structurally different deposits seen in our patient although otherF I G U R E 2 Crystalline inclusions of monoclonal kappa light chains in proximal tubular epithelial cells and bone marrow plasma cells.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…We reported a rare MIg-associated renal disease in which MIg deposited in both organized and non-organized ultrastructures. According to the pathogenesis reported ( 10 ), MIDD and ITG might resulted from immunoglobulins (MIgs) of different origins with unusual or abnormal structures. The deposition may be the consequence of the acquired defects in podocyte functions relating the clearance of the filtrated and retained immunoglobulin, which created the unique environment for deposition ( 19 , 25 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common pathologic form is monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease (MIDD) coexisting with light chain cast nephropathy (LCCN) ( 4 , 6 9 ). However, the combination of two forms of glomerular diseases, especially the co-deposition of organized and non-organized structures was rare ( 3 , 10 ). The presentation of this combination was not simply the add-on, but had unique characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Light chains can cause more than one type of kidney disease. For example, patients with LA may also have light chain deposition disease (LCDD) with or without light-chain cast nephropathy [ 6 ]. Non-organized, granular deposition along the TBM is well known in LCDD; however, little is known about the frequency, clinical and prognostic importance of amyloid fibril deposition along the TBM in systemic LA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%