Proceedings of Austrian Citizen Science Conference 2020 — PoS(ACSC2020) 2021
DOI: 10.22323/1.393.0024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The characteristics of citizen science in a fishbowl

Abstract: This paper reports on a workshop during the Austrian Citizen Science Conference 2020 that allowed discursive conversation about the reasoning and the formation of opinions around assessing short case descriptions as citizen science, or not. Debater's opinions on cases seemed fluid and often changed when new information became available. Hence, the discussions highlighted that the understanding of Citizen Science is fluid and dynamically evolving as we speak.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 'citizen science for food standards challenges' required projects to "be a collaboration between researchers, a specific group of communities and, where appropriate, relevant partners from outside academia" and for communities and partners to be involved in co-creating the projects. The FSA and UKRI provided the following documents as a guide: ECSA's ten principles of citizen science (ECSA, 2015) ECSA characteristics of citizen science (Feord, 2020) the recent FSA publication: Citizen science and food: a review. (Reynolds et al 2021) We refer to our lay co-researchers as community scientists following feedback in our preapplication consultation about the racialised connotations of the term "citizen" and how it could make those from marginalised ethnicities feel that opportunities to contribute to our project were not relevant to them.…”
Section: Definition Of Citizen and Community Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 'citizen science for food standards challenges' required projects to "be a collaboration between researchers, a specific group of communities and, where appropriate, relevant partners from outside academia" and for communities and partners to be involved in co-creating the projects. The FSA and UKRI provided the following documents as a guide: ECSA's ten principles of citizen science (ECSA, 2015) ECSA characteristics of citizen science (Feord, 2020) the recent FSA publication: Citizen science and food: a review. (Reynolds et al 2021) We refer to our lay co-researchers as community scientists following feedback in our preapplication consultation about the racialised connotations of the term "citizen" and how it could make those from marginalised ethnicities feel that opportunities to contribute to our project were not relevant to them.…”
Section: Definition Of Citizen and Community Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%