2003
DOI: 10.1080/14779757.2003.9688301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Characteristics of a Person-Centered Approach to Therapy and Counseling: Criteria for identity and coherence / Die charakteristischen Merkmale eines Personzentrierten Ansatzes in Therapie und Beratung: Identitäts- und Kohärenzkriterien / Las características de un enfoque centrado en la persona en la terapia y el counseling: criterios para identidad y coherencia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…And there are four patterns of the "We" as follows: (1) individualistic position ([I]+[I]=We), which regards the "We" as a stock of isolated egos, represented by [I], and gives priority to individuality so that it is difficult to reach a real We-relationship; (2) collectivistic position (We=[I]+[I]), which cancels the individuality of isolated egos and gives priority to totality by reducing every ego into the "We"; (3) humanistic position (We=I+you), which regards the alter ego under the We-relationship as a "you" which is different from the "I" and cannot be reduced to the "I", while it can be known analogically from the viewpoint of the "I"; (4) personal or dialogic position (We=you+I), which starts epistemologically from an unknown "you" and regards the formation of the "I" as a derivation from recognizing the otherness of the "you", so that the viewpoint of the "I" under the We-relationship is developed from its being from the viewpoint of the "you". [11] According to Schmid, the dialogic position of the "We" describes the real We-relationship and is the basis of person-centered psychotherapy. [11] It is shown in the dialogic position that the Werelationship in nature is not symmetrical, but asymmetrical.…”
Section: Further Development Of Care Ethics: Dependency Trust and The Vulnerable Wementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…And there are four patterns of the "We" as follows: (1) individualistic position ([I]+[I]=We), which regards the "We" as a stock of isolated egos, represented by [I], and gives priority to individuality so that it is difficult to reach a real We-relationship; (2) collectivistic position (We=[I]+[I]), which cancels the individuality of isolated egos and gives priority to totality by reducing every ego into the "We"; (3) humanistic position (We=I+you), which regards the alter ego under the We-relationship as a "you" which is different from the "I" and cannot be reduced to the "I", while it can be known analogically from the viewpoint of the "I"; (4) personal or dialogic position (We=you+I), which starts epistemologically from an unknown "you" and regards the formation of the "I" as a derivation from recognizing the otherness of the "you", so that the viewpoint of the "I" under the We-relationship is developed from its being from the viewpoint of the "you". [11] According to Schmid, the dialogic position of the "We" describes the real We-relationship and is the basis of person-centered psychotherapy. [11] It is shown in the dialogic position that the Werelationship in nature is not symmetrical, but asymmetrical.…”
Section: Further Development Of Care Ethics: Dependency Trust and The Vulnerable Wementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11] According to Schmid, the dialogic position of the "We" describes the real We-relationship and is the basis of person-centered psychotherapy. [11] It is shown in the dialogic position that the Werelationship in nature is not symmetrical, but asymmetrical. It is this asymmetry that brings out the deep meaning of a "subject" ontologically, i.e.…”
Section: Further Development Of Care Ethics: Dependency Trust and The Vulnerable Wementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Acceptance is seen as providing the optimal conditions to activate clients' capacity for growth (Bohart & Tallman, 1999;Freire, 2001). These therapists deemphasize technique in favor of the quality of relationship between clients and therapists and a belief in the clients' actualizing tendency (Bohart & Tallman, 1999;Schmid, 2003).…”
Section: Therapeutic Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mearns & Thorne, 1988), ihre Krisenhaftigkeit oft genug konstatiert (Hutterer, 1992(Hutterer, , 1993Swildens, 2002b;van Kalmthout, 2002) und schließlich auch mit Rettungs-und Ordnungsversuchen bedacht. (Lietaer, 2002;Schmid, 2002Schmid, , 2003. Diskussionen und Fachartikel beschäftigen sich immer wieder mit der Frage, was eigentlich das Zentrale und Unverwechselbare der Klientenzentrierten Psychotherapie sei (z.…”
Section: Einleitung Und Problemunclassified