2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bse.2016.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The characterisation and taxonomic utility of ITS2 in Tenthredopsis Costa, 1859 (Tenthredinidae: Hymenoptera) with some new records from Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ITS2 structures in the database for eukaryotes display a common core structure (Ankenbrand et al, 2015). However, in the previous study of the same family (Budak et al, 2016), the ITS2 structures showed numerous branching. Despite diverged nucleotide sequences of ITS2 for studied taxon, secondary structures displayed a similar pattern.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The ITS2 structures in the database for eukaryotes display a common core structure (Ankenbrand et al, 2015). However, in the previous study of the same family (Budak et al, 2016), the ITS2 structures showed numerous branching. Despite diverged nucleotide sequences of ITS2 for studied taxon, secondary structures displayed a similar pattern.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The intra-specific length variation of ITS2 was found mostly in D. puncticollis (619-624 bp). The length variation of ITS2 in all studied animals was ranged between 100 and 2052 bp (Budak et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The only difference in the structure among the tribe members occurred in Helix IV. The length polymorphism and structural difference of Helix IV were considered the result of RNA strand slippage events occurring in Helix III and are common among most eukaryotes (Mullineux and Hausner, 2009;Budak et al, 2016). Since it has a common shape, the ITS2 secondary structure is not a useful tool to distinguish tribe members.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taxa differing by the CBCs (even by just 1 CBC) in the conserved pairing positions of the ITS2 secondary structure were experimentally observed to be completely incapable of intercrossing (Coleman and Vacquier, 2002). Since this finding referred to the biological species concept, CBCs have been used as a species delimitation tool by many researchers (Müller et al, 2007;Mullineux and Hausner, 2009;Budak et al, 2016;Saha et al, 2017;Karpenko et al, 2018). Furthermore, CBCs in the ITS2 secondary structure and hemi-CBCs, which involve changes on only 1 side of the nucleotide pair, have also been used to assess relationships at the population and species level (Torres-Suárez, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%