2001
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The chaperone function of ClpB from Thermus thermophilus depends on allosteric interactions of its two ATP-binding sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

19
136
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
19
136
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In prokaryotes, as we have demonstrated for chaperones from a thermophilic eubacteria, Thermus thermophilus, heatdamaged proteins were rescued by the cooperative chaperone functions of ClpB (bacterial HSP104), DnaK (bacterial HSP70), DnaJ, and GrpE (4,11). ClpB forms a homo-hexameric complex (580 kDa) as an active species and needs ATP hydrolysis for the function (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). DnaK also has ATPase activity and works with DnaJ and GrpE (termed the DnaK set) (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In prokaryotes, as we have demonstrated for chaperones from a thermophilic eubacteria, Thermus thermophilus, heatdamaged proteins were rescued by the cooperative chaperone functions of ClpB (bacterial HSP104), DnaK (bacterial HSP70), DnaJ, and GrpE (4,11). ClpB forms a homo-hexameric complex (580 kDa) as an active species and needs ATP hydrolysis for the function (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). DnaK also has ATPase activity and works with DnaJ and GrpE (termed the DnaK set) (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The stable K⅐J has been reported only for DnaK and DnaJ from T. thermophilus, but the chaperone function of K⅐J has been studied with a general interest because the current model for the mechanism of DnaK function assumes only transient but not stable interaction between DnaK and DnaJ (4,11,16,19,23). Related to this contention, the chaperone activity of uncomplexed TDnaK and TDnaJ (termed KϩJ) has been reported (14,23,24), but the difference from that of K⅐J is not clear. Here, we carefully compared chaperone activities of the K⅐J set (K⅐J plus TGrpE) and those of the KϩJ set (KϩJ plus TGrpE).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous biochemical studies have revealed that both Hsp104 and ClpB show cooperativity between nucleotide binding sites that controls their ATPase activity (18,19). Mutations at any of the NBDs that inhibit their ATPase activity also impair chaperone activity, indicating that ATP hydrolysis at both NBDs is required for productive substrate handling (20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The steady-state ATPase activity of ClpB NBD2 variants was measured in a coupled colorimetric assay essentially as described previously (Schlee et al, 2001;Beinker et al, 2005). The measurements were performed at 25 C using a Jasco V-650 spectrophotometer (Jasco Germany GmbH).…”
Section: Steady-state Atpase Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has previously been shown that this mutation causes severe defects in both nucleotide binding and ATPase activity (Schlee et al, 2001). To crystallize the mutant ClpB variant NBD2 K601Q, we supplemented the crystallization cocktail with the fluorescently labelled nucleotide MANT-dADP, which has been routinely used for nucleotidebinding studies of ClpB and is known to bind more than 100-fold more strongly to NBD2 than unlabelled ADP (Werbeck et al, 2009).…”
Section: Implications From a Clpbmentioning
confidence: 99%