2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.aml.2011.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The chaos game revisited: Yet another, but a trivial proof of the algorithm’s correctness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, (with a probability one) for appropriate big N < M, the set {x n : N ≤ n ≤ M } should approximate the attractor A F . The simple explanation (see [18]) is that with the probability one, we choose a sequence i = (i 1 , i 2 , . .…”
Section: Chaos Game and Disjunctive Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, (with a probability one) for appropriate big N < M, the set {x n : N ≤ n ≤ M } should approximate the attractor A F . The simple explanation (see [18]) is that with the probability one, we choose a sequence i = (i 1 , i 2 , . .…”
Section: Chaos Game and Disjunctive Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that biological sequences are products of evolutionary processes, ergodic theory aids in modeling the evolutionary dynamics of sequences. This includes understanding how sequences evolve over time, the emergence of specific motifs, and the impact of mutations on sequence patterns [28, 29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%