2016
DOI: 10.1115/1.4034911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Changing Socioeconomic Context of Buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Drivers-Needs-Actions-Systems (DNAS) framework environment includes actions such as thermostat adjustment, lighting adjustment, fans and portable heater operation, and moving between spaces. Other frameworks include detailed characteristics of occupants such as socio-conomic (Andrews, 2017;Kontokosta & Jain, 2015;Tsoulou et al, 2020), subjective values (Hong et al, 2020;Ortiz & Bluyssen, 2018), and activities (Hewitt et al, 2016;Malik & Bardhan, 2020). The recent update on the DNAS framework adds more components relevant to static attributes of building occupants (Chandra-Putra et al, 2021).…”
Section: Occupant Data Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Drivers-Needs-Actions-Systems (DNAS) framework environment includes actions such as thermostat adjustment, lighting adjustment, fans and portable heater operation, and moving between spaces. Other frameworks include detailed characteristics of occupants such as socio-conomic (Andrews, 2017;Kontokosta & Jain, 2015;Tsoulou et al, 2020), subjective values (Hong et al, 2020;Ortiz & Bluyssen, 2018), and activities (Hewitt et al, 2016;Malik & Bardhan, 2020). The recent update on the DNAS framework adds more components relevant to static attributes of building occupants (Chandra-Putra et al, 2021).…”
Section: Occupant Data Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study follows the existing Drivers, Needs, Actions, and Systems (DNAS) framework to provide a better representation of building occupants (see Figure 2). The framework has been recently updated with a more elaborate occupant characteristics that was drawn from previous multiple papers (Andrews, 2017;Chandra-Putra et al, 2021;Hewitt et al, 2016;Hong et al, 2020;Senick, 2015). As described in (Chandra-Putra et al, 2021), the extended DNAS framework categorizes the occupant characteristics into four groups, including socio-demographic, location, subjective values, and activities.…”
Section: Data Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher-level OB data often includes demographic, economic, and social attributes of consumption [11]- [14]. Other disciplines, including environmental psychology [15], sociology [10], and urban planning [11], [16] have undertaken similar efforts The most ambitious to date are the ASHRAE Thermal Comfort Database and ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database [17], [18]. Even these ambitious, valuable efforts are extremely limited in scope, focusing only on a selection of thermal comfort aspects of OB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of generalizability has motivated researchers to develop larger, multi-building databases that could provide a more robust basis for OB modeling (International Energy Agency, 2017;Licina et al, 2018). Higher-level OB data often includes demographic, economic, and social attributes (Andrews, 2017;Kontokosta & Jain, 2015). The most ambitious effort to date is the development of ASHRAE Thermal Comfort Database 1 and 2 (short name: comfort database) (Licina et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper also describes a workflow of using the ontology to generate a synthetic occupant population. Population synthesis has not been very popular in building research (Andrews, 2017). Population synthesis has grown in popularity in other disciplines, particularly in transportation (Williamson et al, 1998), public health (Beckman et al, 1996;E.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%