2017
DOI: 10.1002/pam.21975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Changing Federal Role in School Accountability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research on accountability systems also indicates that schools strategically respond to accountability in ways that maximize their school's ratings or insulates them from potential threats and sanctions (Amrein-Beardsley, 2009;Jacob, 2017;Nichols & Berliner, 2007). The ED and Houston Chronicle found that school personnel (e.g., teachers, principals) were not always knowledgeable about identification policies, the appropriate use of RTI, or how other policies like Section 504 fit with IDEA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research on accountability systems also indicates that schools strategically respond to accountability in ways that maximize their school's ratings or insulates them from potential threats and sanctions (Amrein-Beardsley, 2009;Jacob, 2017;Nichols & Berliner, 2007). The ED and Houston Chronicle found that school personnel (e.g., teachers, principals) were not always knowledgeable about identification policies, the appropriate use of RTI, or how other policies like Section 504 fit with IDEA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under NCLB, states were required to administer sanctions to districts or schools that did not meet expectations, including: forced reduction in administrative funding, implementation of new curriculum, removal and replacement of personnel, altering governance arrangements, and appointing trustees in place of a school board or superintendent (ED, 2002). State accountability systems are grounded in several assumptions (Hursh, 2005;Jacob, 2017;Lipman, 2004). First, public education's primary goal is student achievement, which can be accurately measured by standardized assessments.…”
Section: Logic and Outcomes Of State Accountability Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for example, the nationally representative results from the National assessment of educational progress (Naep) administered in the usa have been reported in the Nation's report Card for several decades (Haertel, 2016). the system of annual testing and reporting is an example of nation-level accountability, but has also been replicated in every state of usa through state-level annual assessments pushed by the No Child left Behind policy in the early 2000s (Jacob, 2017). these system-wide assessments of students' academic performance are mimicked in national education systems worldwide as well.…”
Section: The Irony Of Externally Driven Internal Accountabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finland, Sweden, U.S.A.). The situation in the U.S.A. has been subject to deeper analysis after the 2001 No Child Left Behind Act and its 2015 replacement, Every Student Succeeds Act (see Jacob, ; Joyce, ; Ladd, , and associated discussion).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%