2015
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The changing face of informed consent

Abstract: All healthcare professionals are required to gain a patient's consent before proceeding with examination, investigation or treatment. Gone are the days when consent was about protecting the professional. Following a recent landmark Supreme Court case, 'informed' consent is now embedded in UK law. Patients have the right to high-quality information that allows them to be involved in making decisions about their care. Dentists have a duty of care to provide this information and guide their patients through the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…34,[65][66][67][68][69][70][71] In addition, there were changes in the law on informed consent in the UK. 72 In July 2016, a change in the wording of the NICE guidelines was announced 64 meaning that in individual cases, antibiotic prophylaxis may be appropriate. As discussed elsewhere 73 , the current situation still leaves considerable challenges for dentists when faced with implementing the guidelines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34,[65][66][67][68][69][70][71] In addition, there were changes in the law on informed consent in the UK. 72 In July 2016, a change in the wording of the NICE guidelines was announced 64 meaning that in individual cases, antibiotic prophylaxis may be appropriate. As discussed elsewhere 73 , the current situation still leaves considerable challenges for dentists when faced with implementing the guidelines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Recent changes in the law on informed consent in the UK are particularly relevant. Following a Supreme Court judgment in the case Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board, [19][20][21][22] doctors and dentists must now ensure that patients are aware of any "material risks" involved in a proposed treatment, and of reasonable alternatives. This is a marked change to the previous "Bolam test", 23 which asks whether a doctor or dentist's conduct would be supported by a responsible body of medical opinion.…”
Section: O N F I D E N T I a Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] This change places an onus on clinicians to identify patients at increased risk of infective endocarditis, explain the risks and ways in which it can be reduced (including antibiotic prophylaxis), and then allow them to decide for themselves if they want antibiotic prophylaxis or not. 4 In addition, two widows whose husbands died from infective endocarditis following hygienist visits for dental scaling have been petitioning NICE with the support of Chris Philp, MP for Croydon South.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%