“…In the 25 years since Light fi rst proposed this model of communicative competence, there have been dramatic changes in the AAC fi eld: (a) changes in the demographics of the population that uses AAC; (b) changes in the scope of communication needs that must be considered; (c) changes in the AAC systems that are available; and, (d) changes in expectations for participation by individuals who use AAC (Light & McNaughton, 2012a). It seems appropriate, then, to re-visit the original defi nition of communicative competence to assess its current relevance and validity.…”
Section: Key Changes In the Field Of Augmentative And Alternative Commentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trend towards increased use of photos and video has some potential advantages for individuals with complex communication needs for use of visual images such as photos to enhance communication has a long history in the AAC fi eld (Hanson et al, 2013). With the advent of many social media applications, photos and video have become widely-accepted channels of expression across society (Light & McNaughton, 2012a), and are used to support communication for educational, employment, health, and social purposes (Raghavendra, Newman, Grace, & Wood, 2013 …”
Section: Changes In the Scope Of Communication Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past 25 years, the fi eld of AAC has witnessed signifi cant increases in the numbers of people with complex communication who receive or might benefi t from AAC services; furthermore, the population receiving AAC services is increasingly diverse in terms of age, disability, language, culture, and race/ ethnicity (Beukelman, 2012;Light & McNaughton, 2012a;Mueller, Singer, & Carranza, 2006;Soto & Yu, 2014). In addition to the increased prevalence of individuals with complex communication needs, there have also been signifi cant improvements in preservice and inservice training in AAC over the past 25 years (e.g., Costigan & Light, 2010;Ratcliff, Koul, & Lloyd, 2008), resulting in greater professional awareness and acceptance of AAC intervention generally.…”
Section: Changes In the Demographics Of The Population That Uses Aacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now there is increased recognition that communication needs extend well beyond face-to-face interactions and also include written communication to meet demands at school or in the work place; social media such as Facebook and Instagram to network, share experiences, and establish membership in peer communities; cell phones and texting to connect with friends; blogging to provide commentary and build communities with like interests; Twitter to instantaneously update status and express short bursts of opinion; e-commerce to fulfi ll a wide array of needs and wants, and so on (Light & McNaughton, 2012a With access to an increased array of potential partners, however, have come increased demands for independent and easily intelligible communication. In using various media tools, individuals with complex communication needs cannot co-construct messages with familiar partners as they do in face-to-face interactions; rather, they must develop the skills to independently use these new tools, adhere to their conventions, and communicate with a broader audience that includes those who may have limited or no prior experience with AAC.…”
Section: Changes In the Scope Of Communication Needsmentioning
In 1989, Light defi ned communicative competence for individuals with complex communication needs who require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) as a dynamic interpersonal construct based on functionality of communication; adequacy of communication; and suffi ciency of knowledge, judgment, and skills. Specifi cally, Light argued that, in order to demonstrate communicative competence, individuals who required AAC had to develop and integrate knowledge, judgment, and skills in four interrelated domains: linguistic, operational, social, and strategic. In 2003, Light expanded this defi nition and argued that the attainment of communicative competence is infl uenced by not just linguistic, operational, social, and strategic competencies but also a variety of psychosocial factors (e.g., motivation, attitude, confi dence, resilience) as well as barriers and supports in the environment. In the 25 years since this defi nition of communicative competence for individuals who use AAC was originally proposed, there have been signifi cant changes in the AAC fi eld. In this paper, we review the preliminary defi nition of communicative competence, consider the changes in the fi eld, and then revisit the proposed defi nition to determine if it is still relevant and valid for this new era of communication.
“…In the 25 years since Light fi rst proposed this model of communicative competence, there have been dramatic changes in the AAC fi eld: (a) changes in the demographics of the population that uses AAC; (b) changes in the scope of communication needs that must be considered; (c) changes in the AAC systems that are available; and, (d) changes in expectations for participation by individuals who use AAC (Light & McNaughton, 2012a). It seems appropriate, then, to re-visit the original defi nition of communicative competence to assess its current relevance and validity.…”
Section: Key Changes In the Field Of Augmentative And Alternative Commentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trend towards increased use of photos and video has some potential advantages for individuals with complex communication needs for use of visual images such as photos to enhance communication has a long history in the AAC fi eld (Hanson et al, 2013). With the advent of many social media applications, photos and video have become widely-accepted channels of expression across society (Light & McNaughton, 2012a), and are used to support communication for educational, employment, health, and social purposes (Raghavendra, Newman, Grace, & Wood, 2013 …”
Section: Changes In the Scope Of Communication Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past 25 years, the fi eld of AAC has witnessed signifi cant increases in the numbers of people with complex communication who receive or might benefi t from AAC services; furthermore, the population receiving AAC services is increasingly diverse in terms of age, disability, language, culture, and race/ ethnicity (Beukelman, 2012;Light & McNaughton, 2012a;Mueller, Singer, & Carranza, 2006;Soto & Yu, 2014). In addition to the increased prevalence of individuals with complex communication needs, there have also been signifi cant improvements in preservice and inservice training in AAC over the past 25 years (e.g., Costigan & Light, 2010;Ratcliff, Koul, & Lloyd, 2008), resulting in greater professional awareness and acceptance of AAC intervention generally.…”
Section: Changes In the Demographics Of The Population That Uses Aacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now there is increased recognition that communication needs extend well beyond face-to-face interactions and also include written communication to meet demands at school or in the work place; social media such as Facebook and Instagram to network, share experiences, and establish membership in peer communities; cell phones and texting to connect with friends; blogging to provide commentary and build communities with like interests; Twitter to instantaneously update status and express short bursts of opinion; e-commerce to fulfi ll a wide array of needs and wants, and so on (Light & McNaughton, 2012a With access to an increased array of potential partners, however, have come increased demands for independent and easily intelligible communication. In using various media tools, individuals with complex communication needs cannot co-construct messages with familiar partners as they do in face-to-face interactions; rather, they must develop the skills to independently use these new tools, adhere to their conventions, and communicate with a broader audience that includes those who may have limited or no prior experience with AAC.…”
Section: Changes In the Scope Of Communication Needsmentioning
In 1989, Light defi ned communicative competence for individuals with complex communication needs who require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) as a dynamic interpersonal construct based on functionality of communication; adequacy of communication; and suffi ciency of knowledge, judgment, and skills. Specifi cally, Light argued that, in order to demonstrate communicative competence, individuals who required AAC had to develop and integrate knowledge, judgment, and skills in four interrelated domains: linguistic, operational, social, and strategic. In 2003, Light expanded this defi nition and argued that the attainment of communicative competence is infl uenced by not just linguistic, operational, social, and strategic competencies but also a variety of psychosocial factors (e.g., motivation, attitude, confi dence, resilience) as well as barriers and supports in the environment. In the 25 years since this defi nition of communicative competence for individuals who use AAC was originally proposed, there have been signifi cant changes in the AAC fi eld. In this paper, we review the preliminary defi nition of communicative competence, consider the changes in the fi eld, and then revisit the proposed defi nition to determine if it is still relevant and valid for this new era of communication.
“…Studies have shown that the implementation of AAC resources early in a student's educational experience has the potential to improve the user's academic skills, communication skills, and social skills throughout his or her lifetime (e.g. Chung et al, 2012;Chung and Douglas, 2014;King and Fahsl, 2012;Light and McNaughton, 2012;Millar et al, 2006;Rispoli et al, 2010;Soto et al 2001a;Stoner et al, 2006;Zangari et al, 1994). Based on previously mentioned studies, the effectiveness of AAC systems has been addressed and has resulted in communication enhancements for students with severe communication impairments.…”
The purpose of this study was to examine pre-service special education teachers' perceptions regarding their skills and knowledge about the use of AAC, with respect to how well it prepared them to use AAC with students who have severe communication impairments. A descriptive research design was used to address the research questions. A total of 27 special education pre-service teachers (emphasized whether Early Childhood Special Education or Intellectual Disabilities) completed an online survey. The findings indicate that participants responded positively about their knowledge, ability, skills, and attitudes about teaching and using AAC for students with severe communication disabilities. However, the results found that the majority of participants felt their preparation programs were not adequate in preparing them to implement and use AAC in classrooms. Although the participants felt more confident in their ability to teach students who use AAC, the general consensus was that more preparation training would be helpful in the classroom and with the students themselves. More implications for practice and recommendations for future research are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.