SUMMARY In 59 treated or untreated hypertensive subjects and 52 obese subjects (normotensive or hypertensive), intraarterial blood pressure (BP) was compared to simultaneous auscultatory measurements. In the hypertensive group, arm circumference was less than 35 cm compared to over 35 cm in the obese subjects. The occluding cuffs were 12 x 35 cm and 15 x 43 cm respectively. Mean difference between auscultatory and intraarterial systolic BP (SBP) was among the hypertensive -8.8 mm Hg (SD D[FF 9.0 mm Hg, range + 13/ -28) and among the obese -3.1 mm Hg (SD D(FF 13.8 mm Hg, range + 19/-49). Mean difference auscultatory-intraarterial diastolic BP (DBP) Phase V was among the hypertensive patients + 10.8 mm Hg(SD D1FF 6.8 mm Hg, range + 29/-8), and among the obese + 5.5 mm Hg (SD DIFF 7.3 mm Hg, range + 20/-10). Thus, a 15 x 43 cm cuff used in obese subjects with an arm circumference exceeding 35 cm gave quite as reliable measurements as a 12 x 35 cm cuff used in hypertensive subjects with "normal" dimension of the upper arm (< 35 cm). It is emphasized that there is a wide scatter in the interindividual differences, and it is argued that a comparison between auscultatory and intraarterial BP should be performed in patients with poorly controlled hypertension. (Hypertension 5: 122-127, 1983) KEY WORDS âą blood pressure âą measurement of blood pressure âą hypertension âą obesity S EVERAL studies have been published concerning the difference between direct (intraarterial) and indirect (auscultatory) measurement of brachial artery blood pressure (BP). 1 " 13 In these studies nearly all the subjects have been normotensive controls, and only a few have been treated or untreated hypertensives. In both obese and nonobese hypertensive subjects, we have compared the auscultatory measurements with simultaneous short-lasting intraarterial values in order to evaluate whether there is an artifact using the conventional cuff technique. The aims of the present study were to compare auscultatory and intraarterial readings in a group of consecutively referred hypertensive subjects, and to evaluate similar comparisons performed among obese subjects (hypertensive and normotensive).
Material and MethodsA total of 59 treated or untreated hypertensive patients were investigated (table 1). Before treatment,