2017
DOI: 10.18778/1508-1117.30.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The changes in social and demographic structure of large housing estates in post-socialist Poland and their main determinants

Abstract: Large pre-fabricated housing estates were erected all over Europe, however the political and ideological factors conspired to ensure that they developed on the largest scale in communist countries. Today, they continue to provide some 30–40% of the housing stock in this part of Europe. The present paper discusses the transformations of large housing estates in Poland 25 years after of the collapse of communism. The main purpose of the study was to identify the social and demographic changes in Polish l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical work continues to identify post-socialist housing estates as places of social mixing., e.g. Temelová et al (2011) for Prague, Szafrańska (2011) for Łodz, Grossmann et al (2015) for Leipzig. For Prague, a survey covering perceptions of ideal housing found that large housing estates were considered as ideal housing by one out of five respondents, and by nearly half the respondents living in a housing estate (Sunega et al, 2014).…”
Section: Making Dignity Explicit In Urban Geography: Two Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical work continues to identify post-socialist housing estates as places of social mixing., e.g. Temelová et al (2011) for Prague, Szafrańska (2011) for Łodz, Grossmann et al (2015) for Leipzig. For Prague, a survey covering perceptions of ideal housing found that large housing estates were considered as ideal housing by one out of five respondents, and by nearly half the respondents living in a housing estate (Sunega et al, 2014).…”
Section: Making Dignity Explicit In Urban Geography: Two Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this, the statement of Musterd and Van Kempen (2007) that many dissatisfied residents live in Eastern European housing estates of the postwar period contradicts the empirical results presented above: Soviet housing estates in Dnipro have mostly retained their prestige and have a good reputation. Furthermore, in Dnipro as in some other postcommunist metropolises (e.g., Herfert et al, 2013;Szafrańska, 2014;Gorczyca, 2016;Galuszka, 2020), there is a weak and fragmented influence of such a negative phenomenon as the "large housing estate syndrome" (see more Szafrańska, 2013;Szafrańska, 2017), which comprises socio-spatial and physical degradation of a large housing estate and the formation of a negative perceptron image in relation to it among the rest of the city residents.…”
Section: Neighbourhood Satisfaction In the Post-soviet Metropolis: In...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raising fences and other spatial barriers in large housing estates -the flagship housing developments of the socialist era -is characteristic of the latter phase of post-socialist gating. Considering the relatively high level of safety in this type of residential milieu, any security claims justifying the need for fences remain unfounded (Szafrańska 2017). Moreover, the rejection of modernist…”
Section: Gating and The Common Good After Socialismmentioning
confidence: 99%