2011
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/742/2/112
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Change of the Orbital Periods Across Eruptions and the Ejected Mass for Recurrent Novae Ci Aquilae and U Scorpii

Abstract: I report on the cumulative results from a program started 24 years ago designed to measure the orbital period change of recurrent novae (RNe) across an eruption. The goal is to use the orbital period change to measure the mass ejected during each eruption as the key part of trying to measure whether the RNe white dwarfs are gaining or losing mass over an entire eruption cycle, and hence whether they can be progenitors for Type Ia supernovae. This program has now been completed for two eclipsing RNe: CI Aquilae… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(129 reference statements)
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An upper limit on the ejected mass of order 10 −6  M is suggested from the expansion velocity and t on based on the simple homogenous and uniformly expanding shell models of Schwarz et al (2011, see their Figure 8). This low mass is very similar to those of fast recurrent novae (for example, see Schaefer 2011;Anupama 2013).…”
Section: Xrtsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…An upper limit on the ejected mass of order 10 −6  M is suggested from the expansion velocity and t on based on the simple homogenous and uniformly expanding shell models of Schwarz et al (2011, see their Figure 8). This low mass is very similar to those of fast recurrent novae (for example, see Schaefer 2011;Anupama 2013).…”
Section: Xrtsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In addition, the values are strongly dependent on the assumed geometry. The ejected mass of M H ∼ 4.6 × 10 −6 M for a spherically symmetric geometry is similar to M ejecta = 4.3 × 10 −6 M based on orbital period changes (Schaefer 2011), and 3 × 10 −6 M based on photoionisation models of a clumpy ejecta (Diaz et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…the mass of accreted materials during the quiescent phase minus that ejected at a nova eruption) is positive. The general answer for this is not yet clear, 43 but given the nearly Chandrasekhar mass WD as derived for some recurrent nova systems, at least a part of systems undergoing novae are viable candidates as an SN Ia progenitor.…”
Section: +008mentioning
confidence: 99%