The change in estimate method for selecting confounders: A simulation study

Abstract

Background The change in estimate is a popular approach for selecting confounders in epidemiology. It is recommended in epidemiologic textbooks and articles over significance test of coefficients, but concerns have been raised concerning its validity. Few simulation studies have been conducted to investigate its performance. Methods An extensive simulation study was realized to compare different implementations of the change in estimate method. The implementations were also compared when estimating the association of body mass index with diastolic blood pressure in the PROspective Québec Study on Work and Health. Results All methods were susceptible to introduce important bias and to produce confidence intervals that included the true effect much less often than expected in at least some scenarios. Overall mixed results were obtained regarding the accuracy of estimators, as measured by the mean squared error. No implementation adequately differentiated confounders from non-confounders. In the real data analysis, none of the implementation decreased the estimated standard error. Conclusion Based on these results, it is questionable whether change in estimate methods are beneficial in general, considering their low ability to improve the precision of estimates without introducing bias and inability to yield valid confidence intervals or to identify true confounders.

Real-life effectiveness of transitioning from paliperidone palmitate 1-monthly to paliperidone palmitate 3-monthly long-acting injectable formulation

“…Unlike data-driven methods for confounders selection, such as forward and backward stepwise regression, which introduce significant bias and lead to erroneous confidence intervals, the DAG approach avoids the adjustment for non-confounding variables such as colliders and mediators. 16 Statistical analyses were performed with R version 4.0.4 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).…”

A population-based cohort study for presence of ulceration among cutaneous malignant melanoma subgroups of patients

“…Odds ratio (OR) and mortality difference (MD) were calculated for comparison of the baseline estimate and estimate adjusted by potential confounder (PC). Change-in-estimate(CIE) criterion with cutoff of 10% was applied to determine if an inevitable bias on estimating causal effect of ulceration on MSS was presented ( 25 , 26 ).…”

High Prevalence of Asymptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerosis in Elder Women With Tubal Ligation: Result From a Community-Based Study in Shandong, China

“…The logistic regression model was used to estimate the adjusted association between MRH and aICAS with an odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI. The change-in-estimate method was used to get confounding factors included in the multivariate adjustment ( 18 ). We also performed a sensitivity analysis deleting all missing values.…”