2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The change in axial length in the pseudophakic eye compared to the unoperated fellow eye in children with bilateral cataracts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Foreign authors, relying on age of children at the time of surgery, 4 -6 week age make calculation of IOL for receiving a refraction 8.00 dptr at babies and 6.00 dpr at babies 6 weeks of life are more senior [25]. Other authors when calculating optical power of the implanted IOL suggested to consider initial sizes of eyes.…”
Section: Issn: 2644-1209mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foreign authors, relying on age of children at the time of surgery, 4 -6 week age make calculation of IOL for receiving a refraction 8.00 dptr at babies and 6.00 dpr at babies 6 weeks of life are more senior [25]. Other authors when calculating optical power of the implanted IOL suggested to consider initial sizes of eyes.…”
Section: Issn: 2644-1209mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 It is a prerequisite to measure AL precisely in pseudophakic eyes in many scenarios, such as providing one of the essential biometric information in patients who require IOL exchange or a secondary piggyback IOL implantation, 3,4 or monitoring ocular development and refractive status in children or patients with high myopia. [5][6][7][8] However, precise AL measurement in pseudophakic eyes remains a challenge because IOL implantation could influence the propagation speeds of the ultrasound or light wave. AL shortening or increasing after cataract surgery measured by classical ultrasound biometry has been previously reported, and different ultrasound velocities or correction factors ranging from +0.40 mm to −0.80 mm were suggested to be utilized to eliminate this AL difference in pseudophakic eyes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 , 2 It is a prerequisite to measure AL precisely in pseudophakic eyes in many scenarios, such as providing one of the essential biometric information in patients who require IOL exchange or a secondary piggyback IOL implantation, 3 , 4 or monitoring ocular development and refractive status in children or patients with high myopia. 5 8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%