2015
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011956
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The champion for improved delivery of care to older people in long-term care settings: effects on professional practice, quality of care and resident outcomes

Abstract: The champion for improved delivery of care to older people in long-term care settings: effects on professional practice, quality of care and resident outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The seven-month practice change intervention to support the implementation of the recommended model of care into routine clinical practice consisted of the following evidence-based strategies: leadership/managerial supervision ( Flodgren et al, 2011 ); local clinical practice guidelines ( Rotter et al, 2010 ); electronic prompts and reminders ( Shojania et.al, 2014 ); local opinion leaders/champions ( Flodgren et al, 2011 ;Welsh et al, 2015 ;Woo et al, 2017 ); educational meetings and materials ( Forsetlund et al, 2009 ;Reeves et al, 2013 ); academic detailing (including audit and feedback) ( Chaillet et al, 2006 ;Ivers et al, 2012 ;O'Brien et al, 2007 ); and monitoring and accountability for performance ( Ivers et al, 2012 ). Intervention development was guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework ( Cane et al, 2012 ;Michie et al, 2005 ) with implementation strategy selection targeting system and individual clinician level barriers elicited from formative surveys with ante-natal providers in the participating services Kingsland et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seven-month practice change intervention to support the implementation of the recommended model of care into routine clinical practice consisted of the following evidence-based strategies: leadership/managerial supervision ( Flodgren et al, 2011 ); local clinical practice guidelines ( Rotter et al, 2010 ); electronic prompts and reminders ( Shojania et.al, 2014 ); local opinion leaders/champions ( Flodgren et al, 2011 ;Welsh et al, 2015 ;Woo et al, 2017 ); educational meetings and materials ( Forsetlund et al, 2009 ;Reeves et al, 2013 ); academic detailing (including audit and feedback) ( Chaillet et al, 2006 ;Ivers et al, 2012 ;O'Brien et al, 2007 ); and monitoring and accountability for performance ( Ivers et al, 2012 ). Intervention development was guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework ( Cane et al, 2012 ;Michie et al, 2005 ) with implementation strategy selection targeting system and individual clinician level barriers elicited from formative surveys with ante-natal providers in the participating services Kingsland et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 The effect sizes in both studies were at the upper end of implementation trial outcomes as reported in Cochrane systematic reviews. [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] However, half or fewer reported receipt of the recommended care elements after implementation support, leaving many women without the intended benefits of the clinical guidelines. Such a finding is consistent with the clinical practice change literature generally, which indicates that despite significant effect sizes in trials, the interventions do not result in the majority of patients receiving guideline recommended care.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%