2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.11.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The challenging diagnosis of eccrine poromas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, dermoscopy and RCM can provide valuable noninvasive clues for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with EPC. 2 Our case highlights not only the aggressive behavior of relapsing EPC but also the novel cytomorphologic features under RCM. These findings should be further explored for possible presurgical assessment of EPC considering its high local recurrence rate.…”
Section: Key Messagementioning
confidence: 68%
“…Therefore, dermoscopy and RCM can provide valuable noninvasive clues for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with EPC. 2 Our case highlights not only the aggressive behavior of relapsing EPC but also the novel cytomorphologic features under RCM. These findings should be further explored for possible presurgical assessment of EPC considering its high local recurrence rate.…”
Section: Key Messagementioning
confidence: 68%
“… 1 As it might simulate malignant tumors like basal cell carcinoma due to nonspecific clinical appearance, we highlight the potential usefulness for dermoscopy and second-level noninvasive techniques, including reflectance confocal microscopic examination. 2 Dermoscopy revealed an important distribution and combination of colors: yellow, white, and red in correlation with sebaceous differentiation, fibrosis of the stroma, and increased vascularization, respectively. It also showed different vascular morphologies, possibly resulting from the patterns of tumor growth both in the epidermis and dermis.…”
Section: Histologic Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Susumu ICHIYAMA, 1 Toshihiko HOASHI, 1 Yoko FUNASAKA, 1 Erina MIKAMI, 1 Michiko AKIYAMA, 1 Eiko ESAKI, 1 Masahide KUBO, 2,3 Shin-ichi ANSAI, 4 Masaru TANAKA, 5 Hidehisa SAEKI 1…”
Section: Conflict Of Interest: None Declaredmentioning
confidence: 99%