2019
DOI: 10.1530/eje-19-0101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The challenges of sodium measurements: indirect versus direct ion-selective method

Abstract: Background Diagnosis and treatment of dysnatremia is challenging and further complicated by the pitfalls of different sodium measurement methods. Routinely used sodium measurements are the indirect (plasma/serum) and direct (whole blood) ion-selective electrode (ISE) method, showing discrepant results especially in the setting of acute illness. Few clinicians are aware of the differences between the methods in clinically stable patients or healthy volunteers. Methods Data of 140 patients and 91 healthy volun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings were consistent with previous studies. [12][13][14] According to Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA), the total allowable error for performing serum sodium is ± 4 mmol/l. 15 Our study concluded that there was an increase in the difference between indirect versus direct ISE-measured serum sodium as the level of albumin decreased in the sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings were consistent with previous studies. [12][13][14] According to Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA), the total allowable error for performing serum sodium is ± 4 mmol/l. 15 Our study concluded that there was an increase in the difference between indirect versus direct ISE-measured serum sodium as the level of albumin decreased in the sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our platforms, VBG sodium concentration was on average 1.9 mmol/L lower than simultaneously-obtained serum sodium. One study from two European Hospitals compared sodium measurements ascertained via indirect (plasma/serum) vs direct (whole blood/VBG) methods in 231 participants undergoing HTS infusion ( 23 ). In agreement with our findings, sodium measured on blood gas platforms, was, on average, 1.9 mmol/L lower than serum/plasma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach when using HTS would be to factor in this approximate 2 mmol/L difference between blood gas vs serum/plasma sodium concentrations. However, while this difference is within an acceptable range in absolute numerical terms, it is clinically significant in the context of HTS use ( 23 ). It is thus critical to use a consistent approach in obtaining sodium concentrations when using HTS as opposed to switching between serum/plasma and blood gas sodium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All these methods report data from wet tissue or dry tissue measurement with varying levels of repeatability and reproducibility. However, all these methods require a significantly large tissue sample, of either approximately 0.5 cm in diameter or a tumor tissue volume of around 50–70 μL [ 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 ]. Further, these techniques cannot differentiate between extracellular versus intracellular sodium concentrations.…”
Section: Application Of Sodium Mri As a Prognostic And/or Diagnostic Markermentioning
confidence: 99%