2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.therap.2020.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The challenges of pharmacoepidemiology of orphan drugs in rare diseases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Quality RD registries ipso facto provide a beneficial and applicable platform in all stages of evidence-informed healthcare policymaking, including economic evaluations, and may contribute to a significant advancement in the management of RDs in general [ 28 ]. There is an ongoing discussion about whether the possibility of developing a drug for a particular disease increases if well implemented registries and active patient organizations exist [ 29 , 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality RD registries ipso facto provide a beneficial and applicable platform in all stages of evidence-informed healthcare policymaking, including economic evaluations, and may contribute to a significant advancement in the management of RDs in general [ 28 ]. There is an ongoing discussion about whether the possibility of developing a drug for a particular disease increases if well implemented registries and active patient organizations exist [ 29 , 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the pharmaceutical treatment for rare diseases, patients were often forced to accepted off-label medications because no orphan drugs were approved for the corresponding indications, and their safety was difficult to prove [ 40 ]. In recent years, certain patients with rare diseases had survived as new orphan drugs continue to be approved for marketing, but the course of these patients has never been seen, so the detection of new adverse reactions as rare diseases progress may be a result of the disease rather than an adverse reaction to orphan drugs [ 3 ], which makes monitoring for adverse reactions to orphan drugs more difficult. A correlation is discernible between the incidence of serious drug side-effects and the magnitude of a country’s population; countries with expansive populations manifest a heightened likelihood of encountering serious side-effects in contrast to nations with smaller populations, particularly within the context of post-marketing surveillance of adverse reactions to orphan drugs.…”
Section: Main Research Hot Spots In the Field Of Pharmacovigilance Fo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2002, The World Health Organization (WHO) expanded the definition of pharmacovigilance in its book The Importance of Pharmacovigilance to include “the science and activities relating to the detection, assessment, understanding, and prevention of adverse reactions or any other possible drug-related problems” [ 2 ]. Although the pharmacovigilance regulatory framework did not distinguish between conventional and orphan drugs, the approved of orphan drugs in recent years, and the post-marketing safety evaluation of orphan drugs present unique challenges to regulators [ 3 ]. Rare diseases (RDs) are a group of diseases with very low incidence and drugs used to treat rare diseases are collectively known as orphan drugs (ODs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…При одном и том же орфанном заболевании могут применяться препараты, содержащие разные типы жизнеспособных клеток: дифференцированные, стволовые и фибробласты, индуцированные плюрипотентные, ex vivo генетически модифицированные [41]. К настоящему времени среди огромного числа генетических заболеваний только примерно для 300 нозологических форм существуют методы лечения и соответствующие лекарственные препараты [42,43].…”
Section: обзоры литературыunclassified