2016
DOI: 10.1177/1541931213601451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Challenges of Building Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Teams

Abstract: Intelligent Tutoring Systems have been useful for individual instruction and training, but have not been widely created for teams, despite the widespread use of team training and learning in groups. This paper reviews two projects that developed team tutors: the Team Multiple Errands Task (TMET) and the Recon Task developed using the Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring (GIFT). Specifically, this paper 1) analyzes why team tasks have significantly more complexity than an individual task, 2) describes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In early implementations of this task, the members were required to use specific military phrases designated by the research personnel, but this requirement was sufficiently onerous to prevent some teams from reaching consistent performance levels, even after multiple trials. Additional details on the creation and military basis of this task are described in detail in Bonner et al (2015b), Bonner et al (2016a), and Bonner et al (2016b). While the task context was relatively simple, the Surveillance Scenario became a powerful research testbed because of the ability to explore numerous team tutor research questions using the same task, such as how cognitive load affects ability to perceive feedback, whether knowing one's team member previously affects performance, how consecutive trials form a learning curve, how that learning curve is affected by different forms of feedback, and many others.…”
Section: Goal 2: the Surveillance Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In early implementations of this task, the members were required to use specific military phrases designated by the research personnel, but this requirement was sufficiently onerous to prevent some teams from reaching consistent performance levels, even after multiple trials. Additional details on the creation and military basis of this task are described in detail in Bonner et al (2015b), Bonner et al (2016a), and Bonner et al (2016b). While the task context was relatively simple, the Surveillance Scenario became a powerful research testbed because of the ability to explore numerous team tutor research questions using the same task, such as how cognitive load affects ability to perceive feedback, whether knowing one's team member previously affects performance, how consecutive trials form a learning curve, how that learning curve is affected by different forms of feedback, and many others.…”
Section: Goal 2: the Surveillance Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other elements are the ten steps for authoring a team tutor described below and in Fig. 5, which have been adapted and expanded from the eight steps described in Bonner et al (2016a).…”
Section: Goal 4: Team Tutor Framework -Steps Of Authoring a Team Tutormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the effects are the cost of implementation by researchers, users become socially isolated, lack of communication skills by users, the exposure of users to harmful contents, and many more [19]. is is also supported by other research which stated that developing an intelligent tutoring system is not an easy task and can only be possible with lots of authoring guidelines, feedbacks, and a good team of researchers and developers surrounding the creation of an intelligent tutoring system and serves as its main resource [20].…”
Section: Current and Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Over the past several years, the authors and their colleagues developed and conducted research with the Surveillance Task (two-person team, both same role), the Surveillance with Sniper Task (three-person team, one sniper and two spotter roles), and the Team Multiple Errands Task (three-person team, all the same role). The Surveillance Task is described in more detail in Bonner et al (2016; and Gilbert et al (2017). Each of two team members play the role of a spotter atop a building in the center of a small town and must report to each other when people on the ground below move out of one member's zone into the other member's zone, e.g., "Two people entering your zone at the pole.…”
Section: Three Intelligent Team Tutoring Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%