The challenges and facilitators to successful translation and adaptation of written self-report psychological measures into sign languages: A systematic review.

Chatzidamianos, Gerasimos; Burns, Danielle; Andriopoulou, Panoraia; Archer, Dawn; Feu, Margaret du

doi:10.1037/pas0001061

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 74 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The QuADS tool was selected as it is suitable for systematic reviews of studies using a range of different methods. The QuADS has demonstrated substantial inter-rater reliability, face and content validity24 and has been previously used in systematic reviews in a range of healthcare settings 26–28. The tool consists of 13 criteria, which are scored on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 3, resulting in a possible maximum attainable score of 39.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

What is the impact of healthcare innovation on measurable outcomes of healthcare organisation performance? A systematic review

Madden,

O'Malley,

O'Dowd

et al. 2024

BMJ Innov

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThe lack of quantitative evidence of effectiveness has been cited as a notable shortcoming of initiation and diffusion of innovations in healthcare. Therefore, this review aimed to synthesise research assessing the impact of healthcare innovations on measurable outcomes of healthcare organisation performance.DesignA systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.Data sourcesSystematic searches were conducted across three electronic databases, namely MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesArticles were required to: (a) be published in an English-language, peer-reviewed journal since 2000; (b) describe the application of a specific innovation within a secondary healthcare setting; (c) report data on the summative evaluation of the impact of the innovation on healthcare outcomes, using an outcome measure in line with Level Four of Kirkpatrick’s Evaluation Hierarchy (ie, a measure of organisation performance) and (d) consist of a research design that allowed for evaluation of innovation impact on outcome measures by means of a comparator.ResultsInnovations targeting organisational change were most commonly implemented. Innovations generally had a positive impact, evident in almost two-thirds of the outcome measures assessed across the included articles. Innovation impact was predominantly measured via health utilisation metrics and medical-clinical indicators, with safety outcomes and patient/family perceptions less frequently assessed.ConclusionThere is evidence to show that innovations result in discernible change in organisational importance, including on important metrics such as finance and healthcare utilisation. Bundling outcome measures are recommended to provide a more complete picture of the true impact of innovation on healthcare organisation performance.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

What is the impact of healthcare innovation on measurable outcomes of healthcare organisation performance? A systematic review

Madden,

O'Malley,

O'Dowd

et al. 2024

BMJ Innov

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, cultural adaptation of psychological tests comprises qualitative (linguistic validation) and quantitative methods (statistical validation) (ITC, 2017;Borsa et al, 2012). Several issues in the cultural validation of psychological instruments in the healthcare field should be solved: linguistic, procedural, and cultural (Chatzidamianos et al, 2021). The last issue refers to both cultural background and to the symbolic meaning of the words in different languages and the psychological tool's author style (Meier et al, 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Linguistic and Psychometric Validation of the Ukrainian Translation of the Inventory of Personality Organization-Revised (IPO-R-UKR)

Semkiv

Turetska

Kryvenko

et al. 2022

eejpl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The cultural adaptation of the psychodiagnostic questionnaire involves the implementation of a “double-blind” translation with subsequent linguistic validation considering both linguistic differences and the symbolism of the authors’ statements. Then, based on the survey data of respondents, various psychometric indicators of the questionnaire are checked. The development of Ukrainian-language questionnaires in the psychodynamic paradigm is crucial for creating an appropriate scientific evidence base of therapeutic methods and for psychotherapeutic practice to equip specialists with reliable diagnostic tools. The research objective is to carry out a professional translation of The Inventory of Personality Organization-Revised (IPO-R) into Ukrainian, followed by checking for linguistic validity and psychometric properties. The questionnaire showed high psychometric performance in the long (IPO; Lenzenweger et al., 2001) and short (IPO-R; Smits et al., 2009) versions and foreign language adaptations. It is widely used in psychological research, the theoretical and methodological basis of which is the psychoanalytic concept, in particular, the theory of O. Kernberg (Kernberg, 1986) on different levels of structural organization of personality, which underlies the psychoanalyst's choice of a strategy for working with a client. The created test version of the IPO-R-UKR questionnaire passed the stages of two-sided "double-blind" translation and was agreed upon by a team of philologists and psychologists. Based on the results of 1152 people participating in the empirical research, we have proven IPO-R-UKR to have a similar to the original two-factor structure, good internal consistency of the scales, construct convergent, and criterion validity. Thus, IPO-R-UKR can be used in practical psychological activities and scientific research to identify criteria for the structural organization of personality, such as reality testing, identity diffusion, and mechanisms of psychological defenses, as well as for screening diagnostics of the structural level of personality organization by Kernberg (1986).

show abstract

Removing Stigmatizing Language in Self-Reports: Effects on Psychometric Properties and Respondent Beliefs

Stone

2024

Int J Ment Health Addiction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The challenges and facilitators to successful translation and adaptation of written self-report psychological measures into sign languages: A systematic review.

Abstract: The challenges and facilitators to successful translation and adaptation of written self-report psychological measures into sign languages: A systematic review. Psychological Assessment.

Cited by 7 publications

References 74 publications

What is the impact of healthcare innovation on measurable outcomes of healthcare organisation performance? A systematic review

What is the impact of healthcare innovation on measurable outcomes of healthcare organisation performance? A systematic review

Linguistic and Psychometric Validation of the Ukrainian Translation of the Inventory of Personality Organization-Revised (IPO-R-UKR)

Removing Stigmatizing Language in Self-Reports: Effects on Psychometric Properties and Respondent Beliefs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About